Post: United States Marine Corps vs. Entire British Military
Options
06-08-2010, 01:31 AM
#1
H₂O
Samurai Poster
Vs
USMC.
Britain:
Active personnel 188,440
Reserve personnel 195,300
Budget: £40billion
USMC
203,000 active
40,000 reserve (as of 2009)
Budget: $39billion (£26billion)
USMC has air, naval support included, because they do.
edit: this has turned into UK vs US military thread
You must login or register to view this content.
Wed ****ing dominate the UK, keep it to USMC vs the whole British military
06-13-2010, 08:27 PM
#48
M3RKtemp
Banned
Originally posted by Caspa
I'm pretty sure it's 'murked'.
Why are you telling him how to do his job? It's his, therefore he can do as he pleases, and doesn't need your immature 'advice'.
You're the 12 year old little console noob who just leeches off this forum for your precious little hacks? And great originality on the pedo joke.
Anyone banning you is certainly doing their job, and to a high standard.
On topic, we're all on the same side here, it's pointless arguing who has more guns than who. Overall, the US is far superior in arms and man power, but I think the UK forces have more history, and are probably trained, on average, to a higher standard.
Why are you telling him how to do his job? It's his, therefore he can do as he pleases, and doesn't need your immature 'advice'.
You're the 12 year old little console noob who just leeches off this forum for your precious little hacks? And great originality on the pedo joke.
Anyone banning you is certainly doing their job, and to a high standard.
On topic, we're all on the same side here, it's pointless arguing who has more guns than who. Overall, the US is far superior in arms and man power, but I think the UK forces have more history, and are probably trained, on average, to a higher standard.
Man you must be some kind of wizard. u no how 0ld i iz & evrytink.
06-13-2010, 08:29 PM
#49
NotlocTL
Do a barrel roll!
Originally posted by Don
I'd so thank you if I had rep 
Goddamn stupid American thinking they are untouchable (Note the singular use of American not Americans, it's aimed at this guy only). The Americans are sloppy in warfare, and the moderator comment was stupidly unnecessary.
Goddamn stupid American thinking they are untouchable (Note the singular use of American not Americans, it's aimed at this guy only). The Americans are sloppy in warfare, and the moderator comment was stupidly unnecessary.
Yeah, sure, whatever you say... Way to be the poster child for the anti-American sheeple.
Originally posted by xinfectedsoulx
If anything, your post is the fail post. In two of your answers you have failed to tell people why USMC are better. You first post "USMC!!! Go Devil dogs" or along those lines. There is nothing to to say why. This post, you tried to rip me by saying that my post failed "beyond explanation", yet you fail to tell me why. You fail to say anything other than you trying to be correct. You are the Americans nobody likes. You are the ones why many of the World hate your guts. I genuinely feel sorry for the decent Americans out there, and that will be a few. Before you try to say anyone fails, TELL THEM HOW THE **** THEY FAIL, dumbass.
You are the one who's been brainwashed. You keep telling people to read YOUR schools history book. You're an American in an American school. We all know that Americans have big egos, always want to be this and that. You study from a textbook which is most likely written by an AMERICAN. See what I am saying? In a visitor message to someone, you stated how if the Americans didn't intervene in WWII, most of Europe would be speaking German because you read it in a textbook, by which, again, was most likely written by an egotistic American. You came late, to both wars. Why? Because you Americans knew that the Germans were being beaten, slowly. So then you all decide to hop on your rubber dingies and play action man with the big boys, just so you can say YOU won the war. All you did was speed up the process. You always have to be there, at every war, and when you loose, you make up some bullshit stories.
We have already established that.
You have never whooped our asses and never will. You can't beat us on your own soil without help for **** sake.
On the other hand, I think I just whooped two asses single handedly, don't you?
You are the one who's been brainwashed. You keep telling people to read YOUR schools history book. You're an American in an American school. We all know that Americans have big egos, always want to be this and that. You study from a textbook which is most likely written by an AMERICAN. See what I am saying? In a visitor message to someone, you stated how if the Americans didn't intervene in WWII, most of Europe would be speaking German because you read it in a textbook, by which, again, was most likely written by an egotistic American. You came late, to both wars. Why? Because you Americans knew that the Germans were being beaten, slowly. So then you all decide to hop on your rubber dingies and play action man with the big boys, just so you can say YOU won the war. All you did was speed up the process. You always have to be there, at every war, and when you loose, you make up some bullshit stories.
We have already established that.
You have never whooped our asses and never will. You can't beat us on your own soil without help for **** sake.
On the other hand, I think I just whooped two asses single handedly, don't you?
Lets see, we are the Americans that you don't like because you can't face reality. When the USMC is as big as your ENTIRE military, it's safe to say that the USMC with all of their training would wipe out the UK military. I could care less how much you say your soliders have been trained, we will get in and get out ruthlessly. If it wasn't for liberals like you, we would be out of Iraq and Afganistan years ago.
When you are in school, you read your British textbooks saying you didn't need the US in the war, and your country could beat Germany, Japan, and Italy without our help. BS. Every WWII historian, college professor, or veteran can tell you that without us you would have been raped by Germany. For the record, we have never lost a war.
If we wanted to, we could wipe out your damn country that's smaller than Michigan. We have huge naval, army, USMC, and air force powers that could wipe the UK off the planet. We have almost 145 million soldiers ready to kick arrogant British ass, and you only have 29 million. Go figure.
Originally posted by Sub
Well, seing as the Americans friendly fire the British I think there's a clear winner.
:n:
And to think you haven't friendly fired on us, you have got to be stupid.
Originally posted by Scorpion
England...They've been around for just a bit longer than the U.S..
S.A.S is in Top 5 Best SF in the world...U.S is where???
1) Israeli Sayeret Matkal
2) British SAS
3) Dutch Special Forces
4) Australian SAS
5) US Navy Seals
S.A.S is in Top 5 Best SF in the world...U.S is where???
1) Israeli Sayeret Matkal
2) British SAS
3) Dutch Special Forces
4) Australian SAS
5) US Navy Seals
Just because they've been around longer, does that make them stronger? No.
I'd like to see a link to a source for the best SF in the world.
Originally posted by Garf
I have seen your soldiers fight, I have also seen my own soldiers fight, its called the news and the world wide web.
Americans have killed our soldiers in friendly fire too many times, hence when I said "Spray and pray".
What the **** does me being a Moderator on here have anything to do with this debate? Oh yeah its because I owned your little bitch ass when I banned you and you have tried to tell me how to do my job a few times and have been shot down in flames and now you dont like me
Bye Bye M3RK you just got MURKE
)
Americans have killed our soldiers in friendly fire too many times, hence when I said "Spray and pray".
What the **** does me being a Moderator on here have anything to do with this debate? Oh yeah its because I owned your little bitch ass when I banned you and you have tried to tell me how to do my job a few times and have been shot down in flames and now you dont like me
Bye Bye M3RK you just got MURKE
)
You are a sheep if you actually believe the news when it comes to military actions. I can guaran-damn-tee you that you have not been in an actual firefight or have ever experienced anything like it. To say you've seen how they operate and how they fight is illogical and not believable.
The following 3 users say thank you to NotlocTL for this useful post:
06-13-2010, 08:49 PM
#50
M3RKtemp
Banned
Originally posted by NotlocTL
Yeah, sure, whatever you say... Way to be the poster child for the anti-American sheeple.
Lets see, we are the Americans that you don't like because you can't face reality. When the USMC is as big as your ENTIRE military, it's safe to say that the USMC with all of their training would wipe out the UK military. I could care less how much you say your soliders have been trained, we will get in and get out ruthlessly. If it wasn't for liberals like you, we would be out of Iraq and Afganistan years ago.
When you are in school, you read your British textbooks saying you didn't need the US in the war, and your country could beat Germany, Japan, and Italy without our help. BS. Every WWII historian, college professor, or veteran can tell you that without us you would have been raped by Germany. For the record, we have never lost a war.
If we wanted to, we could wipe out your damn country that's smaller than Michigan. We have huge naval, army, USMC, and air force powers that could wipe the UK off the planet. We have almost 145 million soldiers ready to kick arrogant British ass, and you only have 29 million. Go figure.
:n:
And to think you haven't friendly fired on us, you have got to be stupid.
Just because they've been around longer, does that make them stronger? No.
I'd like to see a link to a source for the best SF in the world.
You are a sheep if you actually believe the news when it comes to military actions. I can guaran-damn-tee you that you have not been in an actual firefight or have ever experienced anything like it. To say you've seen how they operate and how they fight is illogical and not believable.
Lets see, we are the Americans that you don't like because you can't face reality. When the USMC is as big as your ENTIRE military, it's safe to say that the USMC with all of their training would wipe out the UK military. I could care less how much you say your soliders have been trained, we will get in and get out ruthlessly. If it wasn't for liberals like you, we would be out of Iraq and Afganistan years ago.
When you are in school, you read your British textbooks saying you didn't need the US in the war, and your country could beat Germany, Japan, and Italy without our help. BS. Every WWII historian, college professor, or veteran can tell you that without us you would have been raped by Germany. For the record, we have never lost a war.
If we wanted to, we could wipe out your damn country that's smaller than Michigan. We have huge naval, army, USMC, and air force powers that could wipe the UK off the planet. We have almost 145 million soldiers ready to kick arrogant British ass, and you only have 29 million. Go figure.
:n:
And to think you haven't friendly fired on us, you have got to be stupid.
Just because they've been around longer, does that make them stronger? No.
I'd like to see a link to a source for the best SF in the world.
You are a sheep if you actually believe the news when it comes to military actions. I can guaran-damn-tee you that you have not been in an actual firefight or have ever experienced anything like it. To say you've seen how they operate and how they fight is illogical and not believable.
Thank...YOU!
Lol, I wouldn't be surprised if you were a soldier or something, lol!
The following user thanked M3RKtemp for this useful post:
The following user thanked Stub Hero for this useful post:
06-13-2010, 11:43 PM
#53
xSiiK---AT0MIK
ಠ_ಠ
Originally posted by M3RK
You speak as if you've seen our soldiers fight before?!
You also speak as if you've seen your own soldiers fighting.
You also speak as if you've seen your own soldiers fighting.
me and my 2 brothers where and are serving brittish soldiers in iraq and afganistan
the US and Brittish have trade soldiers to see how the other armys traning is going and how it evolves what tactics you use ect, in a war ofcourse the US would win, no not by troop numbers but by its economy, on average the uk spends money on 100 fire arms wher as the us can do 1500, 100 guns vs 1500, the brittish have vastly superior traning and tatics, the us arent trained expertly in tatics, its mostly see a insurgent/milita call in air support and blow the shit of out them civilians and your own troops
when i was in iraq, 4 of my team died, 1 by IED 3 by US friendly fire, and another 7 where out of commision due to that friendly fire incodent when i was in iraq 68.8% of deaths where due to friendly fire in my regiment
yes head to head the us would win due to the cash and man power u can throw at us
even numbers same guns even playing field, the brittish would disgrace you,
1 kid who was trade with us he got 3 medals for passing a ****ing test WTF 99.999999% of your medals mean shit another kid got a medal cause he finished a British assault course and failed an fire arms test i mean u get medals for failing too....
my regiment dureing the later stages of iraq had a US "tag along" to take over when we left the iraq people ****ing hate you.. i mean realy hate you we almost died because of them hateing you
i myself was a trade over student for 3 months and i have to say your methods of crowd control and general training are... well lets say iraq soldiers probbaly had better training
you HAVE the technology to win wars, but not win over people and thats what realy matters when trying to free a country, i personaly saw the stage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 of the american battle and freedom plan... there was NO planing for after you defeated the iraqi army
before you flame ect
its a FACT the us arent the best army, the best and biggest are 2 different things,
and who said u havent lost a war?, the only country to never lose a war is isriel
the best trained army is the german then isriel then brittish then austrailian then the US, u might say isriel germany wtf?, but both have "caps" on the number of troops they can have due to politics so the troops they have need to be trained to an extreme standerd 50% of the german army is trained in officer tatics and training
and i saw another post of osama binladen "bomb the shit out of him"
you obviously have no idea how hard a mountain is to bomb, the mountain tunnels go in the mountains for hundreds of feet when thers about 100 million tons of rock in the way a bomb will just scratch the surface, it doesent matter hes probbaly dead anyway his kidneys and liver have been failing for years now, and for your information, the americans trained and supplied osama binladen himself with cash fire arms and bombs
The following user thanked xSiiK---AT0MIK for this useful post:
06-14-2010, 12:03 AM
#54
H₂O
Samurai Poster
Originally posted by Scorpion
1) Israeli Sayeret Matkal
2) British SAS
3) Dutch Special Forces
4) Australian SAS
5) US Navy Seals
Special Forces dont win a war..and where are you getting this info from? Good teir 1 units will not release anything about their missions, success rate, and other things needed to "compare special forces"
Originally posted by xinfectedsoulx
Have you heard of those things on Television called '
ocumentaries'? Or do they just fly the American flag on all channels with the national anthem in the background all day?
Anyway, these mysterious Documentaries have some good information on them of real accounts. Should try watching some sometime.
ocumentaries'? Or do they just fly the American flag on all channels with the national anthem in the background all day?Anyway, these mysterious Documentaries have some good information on them of real accounts. Should try watching some sometime.
You must login or register to view this content.
There is always friendly fire on both sides.
Originally posted by Don
I'll quote from wikipedia
Because wikipedia is 100% right..
wikipedia is not a credible citable source, anyone can edit it.
Originally posted by another user
So that you know the ASRS was the beginning of the seals.
UDTs and Marine Raiders were the beginning of SEALs.
Originally posted by another user
And for -Garf-, you're correct. SAS =99% success rate SEAL's have a 95% success rate
SEAL's have a 95% success rate
I guarantee you its lower than that on both sides.
Special Operations dont win wars, not at all. UK seems to think a team of maybe 600 men can kill 1,000,000 men singlehandedly without artillery, air, naval or tank/vehicle support. Special Operations go behind enemy lines with limited ammo and if there cover is blown they are ****ed. Its not COD and you succeed everytime. Missions in which they fail in you dont hear about, its called propaganda.
Originally posted by HSx9
The SAS can pretty much own the military. US can't even find Osama Bin Laden with their so called "advanced technology"
15 year old kids thinking the SAS runs the military...****ing retards the grunt is your military, not some special ops shitbird
Originally posted by Vanitas
Even though I'm American, I completely agree. We let Bin Laden get away, we could have bombed those mountains.
We did. We carpet bombed the **** out of those mountains. Read up on it, it really came to warlords we paid off betraying us.
Originally posted by Sub
In all honesty, does any one really care who has the best army? The Taliban owns both of them put together.
They use guerrilla warfare. If we were given the order to invade the country and kill everybody, including the civilians, there would be no more Taliban.
Originally posted by Me
me and my 2 brothers where and are serving brittish soldiers in iraq and afganistan
the US and Brittish have trade soldiers to see how the other armys traning is going and how it evolves what tactics you use ect, in a war ofcourse the US would win, no not by troop numbers but by its economy, on average the uk spends money on 100 fire arms wher as the us can do 1500, 100 guns vs 1500, the brittish have vastly superior traning and tatics, the us arent trained expertly in tatics, its mostly see a insurgent/milita call in air support and blow the shit of out them civilians and your own troops
when i was in iraq, 4 of my team died, 1 by IED 3 by US friendly fire, and another 7 where out of commision due to that friendly fire incodent when i was in iraq 68.8% of deaths where due to friendly fire in my regiment
yes head to head the us would win due to the cash and man power u can throw at us
even numbers same guns even playing field, the brittish would disgrace you,
1 kid who was trade with us he got 3 medals for passing a ****ing test WTF 99.999999% of your medals mean shit another kid got a medal cause he finished a British assault course and failed an fire arms test i mean u get medals for failing too....
my regiment dureing the later stages of iraq had a US "tag along" to take over when we left the iraq people ****ing hate you.. i mean realy hate you we almost died because of them hateing you
i myself was a trade over student for 3 months and i have to say your methods of crowd control and general training are... well lets say iraq soldiers probbaly had better training
you HAVE the technology to win wars, but not win over people and thats what realy matters when trying to free a country, i personaly saw the stage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 of the american battle and freedom plan... there was NO planing for after you defeated the iraqi army
before you flame ect
its a FACT the us arent the best army, the best and biggest are 2 different things,
and who said u havent lost a war?, the only country to never lose a war is isriel
the best trained army is the german then isriel then brittish then austrailian then the US, u might say isriel germany wtf?, but both have "caps" on the number of troops they can have due to politics so the troops they have need to be trained to an extreme standerd 50% of the german army is trained in officer tatics and training
and i saw another post of osama binladen "bomb the shit out of him"
you obviously have no idea how hard a mountain is to bomb, the mountain tunnels go in the mountains for hundreds of feet when thers about 100 million tons of rock in the way a bomb will just scratch the surface, it doesent matter hes probbaly dead anyway his kidneys and liver have been failing for years now, and for your information, the americans trained and supplied osama binladen himself with cash fire arms and bombs
the US and Brittish have trade soldiers to see how the other armys traning is going and how it evolves what tactics you use ect, in a war ofcourse the US would win, no not by troop numbers but by its economy, on average the uk spends money on 100 fire arms wher as the us can do 1500, 100 guns vs 1500, the brittish have vastly superior traning and tatics, the us arent trained expertly in tatics, its mostly see a insurgent/milita call in air support and blow the shit of out them civilians and your own troops
when i was in iraq, 4 of my team died, 1 by IED 3 by US friendly fire, and another 7 where out of commision due to that friendly fire incodent when i was in iraq 68.8% of deaths where due to friendly fire in my regiment
yes head to head the us would win due to the cash and man power u can throw at us
even numbers same guns even playing field, the brittish would disgrace you,
1 kid who was trade with us he got 3 medals for passing a ****ing test WTF 99.999999% of your medals mean shit another kid got a medal cause he finished a British assault course and failed an fire arms test i mean u get medals for failing too....
my regiment dureing the later stages of iraq had a US "tag along" to take over when we left the iraq people ****ing hate you.. i mean realy hate you we almost died because of them hateing you
i myself was a trade over student for 3 months and i have to say your methods of crowd control and general training are... well lets say iraq soldiers probbaly had better training
you HAVE the technology to win wars, but not win over people and thats what realy matters when trying to free a country, i personaly saw the stage 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 of the american battle and freedom plan... there was NO planing for after you defeated the iraqi army
before you flame ect
its a FACT the us arent the best army, the best and biggest are 2 different things,
and who said u havent lost a war?, the only country to never lose a war is isriel
the best trained army is the german then isriel then brittish then austrailian then the US, u might say isriel germany wtf?, but both have "caps" on the number of troops they can have due to politics so the troops they have need to be trained to an extreme standerd 50% of the german army is trained in officer tatics and training
and i saw another post of osama binladen "bomb the shit out of him"
you obviously have no idea how hard a mountain is to bomb, the mountain tunnels go in the mountains for hundreds of feet when thers about 100 million tons of rock in the way a bomb will just scratch the surface, it doesent matter hes probbaly dead anyway his kidneys and liver have been failing for years now, and for your information, the americans trained and supplied osama binladen himself with cash fire arms and bombs
Well said.
The following user thanked H₂O for this useful post:
06-14-2010, 12:25 AM
#55
HowsMySHOOTING
Watch the skies, traveler
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
