Post: United States Marine Corps vs. Entire British Military
06-08-2010, 01:31 AM #1
H₂O
Samurai Poster
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Entire British Military
Vs
USMC.

Britain:
Active personnel 188,440
Reserve personnel 195,300
Budget: £40billion

USMC
203,000 active
40,000 reserve (as of 2009)
Budget: $39billion (£26billion)


USMC has air, naval support included, because they do.


edit: this has turned into UK vs US military thread
You must login or register to view this content.

Wed ****ing dominate the UK, keep it to USMC vs the whole British military
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
06-14-2010, 02:56 AM #56
Originally posted by SHOOTIN View Post
USA will win any war.. (Im Canadian)


if china changed their currency value to the standerd of around a dollar, they would be the biggest and best equiped army in the world


in say 20 years if chine keeps its currency low value they'll still be richer than america

economy wins wars not troop numbers, even tho china has a bigger army

economy = cash, cash = techology, technology = less troops to do the same job, = less troops for the job = more and better equiped units

its a fact economy wins wars look up history take for example WWII germans had a shit economy after WWI but built it up for WWII they invaded countrys took their riches and factorys the more countrys they invaded the more money they had to burn, more money = better equipment ect

the economy cycle happens in every war


america is on top for now but in a few years you wont be china russia south korea japan tailand all have economy riseing faster than the us, china and south korea have more technological weapons, they supply the US

but china is the only country that will take over the US any time soon
06-14-2010, 02:58 AM #57
HowsMySHOOTING
Watch the skies, traveler
Originally posted by Me View Post
if china changed their currency value to the standerd of around a dollar, they would be the biggest and best equiped army in the world


in say 20 years if chine keeps its currency low value they'll still be richer than america

economy wins wars not troop numbers, even tho china has a bigger army

economy = cash, cash = techology, technology = less troops to do the same job, = less troops for the job = more and better equiped units

its a fact economy wins wars look up history take for example WWII germans had a shit economy after WWI but built it up for WWII they invaded countrys took their riches and factorys the more countrys they invaded the more money they had to burn, more money = better equipment ect

the economy cycle happens in every war


america is on top for now but in a few years you wont be china russia south korea japan tailand all have economy riseing faster than the us, china and south korea have more technological weapons, they supply the US

but china is the only country that will take over the US any time soon


I agree but if China attempted that then I think USA and Britain would join sides (they already are on the same side) and go to war against china if they attempted anything silly like an invasion
06-14-2010, 12:07 PM #58
xinfectedsoulx
Daddy's home.
Originally posted by NotlocTL View Post

Lets see, we are the Americans that you don't like because you can't face reality. When the USMC is as big as your ENTIRE military, it's safe to say that the USMC with all of their training would wipe out the UK military. I could care less how much you say your soliders have been trained, we will get in and get out ruthlessly. If it wasn't for liberals like you, we would be out of Iraq and Afganistan years ago.


So what, you have a branch that's bigger than a country. My friend has a dog that's bigger than cats but is shit scared of them. Size has nothing to do with it. You have a big army because you have a big country. We have a small army because we have a small country. Your army will cover your country as much as our army will cover out country. See what I am saying?

Which country has pulled out of Iraq? Britain. Which country is still in Iraq? America. Yeah, so much for us "liberals".


Originally posted by another user
When you are in school,
I don't go to school thanks. I'm a big boy.

Originally posted by another user
you read your British textbooks saying you didn't need the US in the war, and your country could beat Germany, Japan, and Italy without our help. BS. Every WWII historian, college professor, or veteran can tell you that without us you would have been raped by Germany.
Actually, Russia was the country we needed. We were holding of Germany just fine, but with Russia we would have ended the war quicker. Russia was the key player in WW2. If Germany got it, everyone would have been ****ed, anally. We didn't need you. Like I said, you helped speed the process up. Germany was already falling. Slowly, but falling.

Originally posted by another user
For the record, we have never lost a war.


So what about Vietnam? Does that not exist to you because you didn't win. Stop talking complete bullshit about how you haven't lost wars when you have lost many.

Seminole Wars 1, 2 & 3
Vietnam War
The Korean War
The War of 1812
Red Cloud's War

I count 7. Again, do you not learn about wars you don't win?

Originally posted by another user
If we wanted to, we could wipe out your damn country that's smaller than Michigan. We have huge naval, army, USMC, and air force powers that could wipe the UK off the planet. We have almost 145 million soldiers ready to kick arrogant British ass, and you only have 29 million. Go figure.


So ****ing what. Stop talking about the size of your pathetic army. So ****ing what you have a bigger army. You have a bigger army because you have a bigger ****ing country. China have 2.25 million men with 1.2 million reserve. India have 1.4 million with 1.8 million reserve. North Korea have 1.1 million and 4.7 million reserve. Russia have 1 million with 2.4 million reserve. USA have 1.4 and 1.4 so where the **** you got "145 million" and Britains "29 million" from I have no idea. Hell, NK is smaller than you, but they have more men than you, yet you all seem to want to go to war with them. If size matters, you wouldn't want to go to war.


Originally posted by another user
Just because they've been around longer, does that make them stronger? No.


Erm, yes it does. If I was to form an army right now, would it mean that I could kick the USMC's ass? No. Why? Because they have more experience than my army would, just like the SAS have more than you and our army has more experience than yours. you really are stupid.

Originally posted by another user
I can guaran-damn-tee you that you have not been in an actual firefight or have ever experienced anything like it. To say you've seen how they operate and how they fight is illogical and not believable.


I can guaran-damn-tee that you haven't either. For you to say how they operate and how they fight is illogical and not believable.

And a quick FYI to the people who brought up the Revolutionary war, America still didn't win, Britain did. America was not formed until after the victory, so therefore America didn't exist and neither did Americans. It was Britain on Britain, well, technically Britain, Spain, France and the Dutch on Britain. So without us "ignorant ass" you wouldn't be here today. Your welcome.
06-14-2010, 02:21 PM #59
Glitch3r
As Ballin As Possible
Looking at the thread title, "United States Marine Corps vs. Entire British Military" it seems like this thread was created to show hate and despite against the Brits in an attempt to feel good about yourself.

I hadn't expected anything like this from you, H₂O. I am guessing you were a victim to some sort of unfair use, or abuse of something considered unfair while playing PlayStation yesterday by a Brit, which lead to a fight, which made you want to go online and show despite against your own ancestors?
06-14-2010, 04:38 PM #60
havoc390
Bounty hunter
We are on the same side. We both lose wars. We both have great armies. We both have way too many people that die because politics is all about money.
06-14-2010, 08:27 PM #61
sysonz
Haxor!
Originally posted by NotlocTL View Post
Wrong. It was made by Barrett Firearms in the US, headquartered in Tenessee.

This post is full of epic fail, beyond explanation.



You have no clue. It was the bleeding heart liberals that rioted so damn much that made us back out and not focus on the objective on killing every NVA/Viet cong F*cker over there. If you really think that the Vietnamese ran us over then go read a damn history book and soldiers accounts of the war.

Another victim of brainwashing.


aww did I touch a nerve with a yank oh well you can't escape the truth bitch
06-14-2010, 08:33 PM #62
Stub Hero
Laying low low low
Originally posted by NotlocTL View Post
See, that's the kind of shit that we don't care to hear, because we all know it's WRONG. Go sip the kool-aid somewhere else kid.


Ah Americans will never understand humour.
06-14-2010, 08:47 PM #63
I have to go with the British because I support my own country. But to be honest from the stats above this would be a good fight and in the end it would come down to who has the superior training but I know absolutely nothing on that topic so yer I'm going to sit back and watch everyone else fight this out.

Just out of interest and to put an end to this who designed the Barrett 50 .cal argument I decided to have a look at the wiki article and I found this check the first sentence and it's still on wikipedia right now:

Barrett Firearms Manufacturing was founded by Ronnie Barrett for the single purpose of raping terroists. it owns in cod4 i love this weapon 12.7×99mm NATO (.50 BMG) ammunition, originally developed for and used in M2 Browning machine guns. Barrett began his work in the early 1980s and the first working rifles were available in 1982, hence the designation M82. Barrett designed every single part of the weapon personally and then went on to market the weapon and mass produce it out of his own pocket. He continued to develop his rifle through the 1980s, and developed the improved M82A1 rifle by 1986.
06-14-2010, 08:54 PM #64
Dewd
Haxor!
Are you kidding me? I hope all you Americans are still proud of your country when you lose miserably.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo