Post: Sexuality
10-16-2011, 04:46 PM #1
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Important note: This is a very touchy subject to some people and rightfully so. Whilst negative comments about any given sexuality are OK, pointless and unnecessary bashing of other people's sexuality will not be tolerated. Once you cross this line your post(s) will be deleted and you will be warned, and if you persist you will be punished for flaming. I know this is a very strongly worded warning, however I feel given the thread topic it's utterly necessary.


Anyway, onto the debate itself- sexuality. There are many different labels of sexuality, so I'd thought I'd list them below(largely C/P to save time, if I missed any or falsely described anything let me know):

  • Heterosexuality- Is the sexual attraction between members of the opposite sexes such as a man attracted to a woman and vice-versa.
  • Homosexuality- is the sexual attraction between members of the same sexes such as man to man and woman to woman.
  • Bisexuality- Is the sexual attraction to both the opposite and same sexes such as man to man and man to woman, woman to woman and woman to man.
  • Asexuality- Is also known as nonsexuality which is the lack of sexual attraction and sexual interest towards others.
  • Polysexuality- Is the sexual attraction to more than one gender but do not wish to be known as bisexual as it implies that there are only two binary sexes, do not confuse this with pansexuality ('pan' meaning all) and ('poly' meaning many).
  • Pansexuality- Is the sexual attraction towards people regardless of gender also known as omnisexuality. Some pansexuals refer to themselves as gender blind as to them gender is insignificant in determining whether they will be sexually attracted to others.
  • Transexualism- Is when a person identifies themselves as a certain sex different from their own biological one. For example a person may be born male, and is uncomfortable with their gender as a male and changes to a female, or vice-versa.

Personally I'm heterosexual, however I have no problems with other people expressing their own sexuality and being who they really are.

Feel free to comment below and be honest, then hopefully this thread can be used to maturely discuss sexuality away from the nonsense you so often see elsewhere Smile
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 4 users say thank you to Clutch Hunterr for this useful post:

cielphantomhive, killswitchhdpro, SuperGamecube64
10-16-2011, 04:57 PM #2
DiJiTaLGoDz
Former Staff
I'm heterosexual, and I have no problem with any other sexualities as long as they don't hit on me. I know a couple gay dudes and I treat them just like any other friend. Cool Man (aka Tustin) :y:

The following 9 users say thank you to DiJiTaLGoDz for this useful post:

Ameht!, Arman M., Chaz, Original, hustlnpoon, Shepleklet, XHaveNOFearX, xSoulEdge
10-16-2011, 05:07 PM #3
EZ.
< ^ > < ^ >
Heterosexuality :black: but i couldn't care less how others live their lives as long as they are not ****ing animals because i find that demonic and disgusting (who ever does that should burn)
10-16-2011, 05:11 PM #4
Original
League Champion
Heterosexual right here, I have no problems with any other sexualities; I have gay friends, No problem with them whatsoever; I know I'm 'Straight' but there's nothing wrong with a bit of controlled man love ( A friendly male hug, not entering the exit hole!)

That's normal right? :fa:
10-16-2011, 08:30 PM #5
Pricey91
Professor of trollology
Originally posted by Diji View Post
I'm heterosexual, and I have no problem with any other sexualities as long as they don't hit on me. I know a couple gay dudes and I treat them just like any other friend. Cool Man (aka Tustin) :y:


I love how someone groaned this Happy What's the bet he's 12 years old or religious...

Personally, I'm hetro. I really couldn't care about other peoples sexuality, if you want to do it go for it.

The following 3 users say thank you to Pricey91 for this useful post:

DiJiTaLGoDz, Microsuck, Shepleklet
10-16-2011, 10:52 PM #6
TornadoCreator
A Storm Approaches.
Originally posted by Clutch
Anyway, onto the debate itself- sexuality. There are many different labels of sexuality, so I'd thought I'd list them below(largely C/P to save time, if I missed any or falsely described anything let me know):

  • Heterosexuality- Is the sexual attraction between members of the opposite sexes such as a man attracted to a woman and vice-versa.
  • Homosexuality- is the sexual attraction between members of the same sexes such as man to man and woman to woman.
  • Bisexuality- Is the sexual attraction to both the opposite and same sexes such as man to man and man to woman, woman to woman and woman to man.
  • Asexuality- Is also known as nonsexuality which is the lack of sexual attraction and sexual interest towards others.
  • Polysexuality- Is the sexual attraction to more than one gender but do not wish to be known as bisexual as it implies that there are only two binary sexes, do not confuse this with pansexuality ('pan' meaning all) and ('poly' meaning many).
  • Pansexuality- Is the sexual attraction towards people regardless of gender also known as omnisexuality. Some pansexuals refer to themselves as gender blind as to them gender is insignificant in determining whether they will be sexually attracted to others.
  • Transexualism- Is when a person identifies themselves as a certain sex different from their own biological one. For example a person may be born male, and is uncomfortable with their gender as a male and changes to a female, or vice-versa.

Personally I'm heterosexual, however I have no problems with other people expressing their own sexuality and being who they really are.

Feel free to comment below and be honest, then hopefully this thread can be used to maturely discuss sexuality away from the nonsense you so often see elsewhere Smile


Wow, opened up a can of worms here haven't you. I'm about to be extremely controversial as I'm about to re-define the sexualities and add one more...


  • Heterosexuality - The sexual attraction between members of the opposite sex. I have no issue with this definition, here we agree.
  • Homosexuality - The sexual attraction between members of the same sex. Again, we agree.
  • Bisexuality - The sexual attraction towards members of either sex. Again, we agree.
  • Asexuality - The lack of a sexual attraction. Four for four, we agree again.
  • Polysexuality - Ok, this is where we disagree. Polysexuals are bisexuals who are too pretentious to call themselves bi or somehow deluded into thinking there's more than two sexes. There isn't. This is just another name for bisexual and it's unnecessary because it doesn't matter how much they dislike the implication that there's only two genders, there ARE only two genders.
  • Pansexuality - Again, this is another needless pretentious term for bisexual. It serves no purpose whatsoever except for identifying pretentious douches.
  • Transexualism - Not a sexuality and should not be linked with sexuality, if anything this is a form of body dysmorphic disorder.


Ok, that's the list so far. I feel we should add...


  • Paedosexuality/Paedophilia - The sexual attraction towards pre-pubescent children.


Now, according to any encyclopaedia there are four sexualities. Heterosexual, Homosexual, Bisexual and Asexual. This is all, and I agree with this so far, the additional so-called sexualities posted earlier are unnecessary, but I feel we should add Paedosexual (and perhaps Gentrosexual; the sexual attraction towards the elderly), because it's so misunderstood and most certainly fits the criterion for a sexuality. It's a specific human characteristic that someone cannot become aroused without. To label it a fetish I feel is a way of masking it and pushing it to a point where people can ignore it, this is why the term "Paedosexual" doesn't actually exist but the term "Paedophilia" does.

The reason I feel it's important to recognise this fifth sexuality is all four of the others involve only consenting adults (or in the case of asexuality no-one), so no reasonable person can have an issue with them. But with Paedophiles, they cannot engage in any sexual acts without involving someone who by definition cannot give informed consent. This is a major issue, because in our society we ostracise these people without a second thought. People seem incapable of considering that "Child Rapist" and "Paedophile" are not the same thing, (oh and I hate the term "Child Molester", it's not "molestation" it's fĂșcking rape, call it what it is). A rapist is a sick twisted person trying to force themselves on others, usually to fulfil a power-fantasy. A paedophile is someone unfortunate enough to have been born with a sexual attraction to the only group of people they can't have sex with. There lives must be extremely difficult and they must feel extremely frightened every day. The world says how they'd slaughter "paedophiles" and how they're the scum of the earth constantly. Even smart, liberal minded people make these statements. This is why I bring this up, because honestly, how is anyone supposed to suppress these urges, come to terms with their desires and eventually get help from medical professionals if they can't even admit it to themselves without massive self-loathing and admitting it to even the closest of friends and family would make them shun them instantly. This isn't like homosexuality, paedophiles will never be able to stop feeling attracted to kids, so they need an outlet, therapy perhaps, and while we're making them out to be the scum of the world more and more of them are falling apart. It's common place for paedophiles to commit suicide when they admit their sexuality to themselves out of fear that they'll be labelled a child molester when they'd never dream of raping someone. This is the truly oppressed sexuality... the sad thing is, no-one can even stand up for them without being accused of being a child molester themselves, and that accusation terrifies people. Not me though, I'll always speak out for the minority.

...you wanted controversy Clutch Hunter, you've got it.

Oh, and I'm Bisexual, the real kind of bisexual too, the kind that has sex with both men and women, not just the kind that says they're bi and kisses someone of the same sex when they're a bit drunk. Obviously I have no issue with other sexualities as I'm not a complete twat.

---------- Post added at 11:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:45 PM ----------

Originally posted by EZ. View Post
Heterosexuality :black: but i couldn't care less how others live their lives as long as they are not ****ing animals because i find that demonic and disgusting (who ever does that should burn)


Why exactly... I mean let's face it, you're not hurting anyone, and if a horse doesn't want you to fĂșck it, you ain't gonna fĂșck it.

In all seriousness, bestiality isn't really a sexuality so much as a fetish, and really... I'm not sure where I stand on it. It makes me physically sick to think about it, but really if someone's prepared to put their dick in a Doberman they're really rather brave, because you know what; if that Doberman decides it doesn't like you any more, you no longer have a face. So really, I can't claim there's really a lack of consent here, animals aren't just going to sit back and let you screw them unless they want you to screw them. Personally, I'd rather just pretend it doesn't happen at all if it's all the same to you because I'm starting to feel queasy.
10-16-2011, 11:10 PM #7
EZ.
< ^ > < ^ >
Originally posted by TornadoCreator View Post
Wow, opened up a can of worms here haven't you. I'm about to be extremely controversial as I'm about to re-define the sexualities and add one more...


Why exactly... I mean let's face it, you're not hurting anyone, and if a horse doesn't want you to fĂșck it, you ain't gonna fĂșck it.

In all seriousness, bestiality isn't really a sexuality so much as a fetish, and really... I'm not sure where I stand on it. It makes me physically sick to think about it, but really if someone's prepared to put their dick in a Doberman they're really rather brave, because you know what; if that Doberman decides it doesn't like you any more, you no longer have a face. So really, I can't claim there's really a lack of consent here, animals aren't just going to sit back and let you screw them unless they want you to screw them. Personally, I'd rather just pretend it doesn't happen at all if it's all the same to you because I'm starting to feel queasy.



What if it's a puppy, idk sometimes the animal probably does like it but i still find that so nasty. I can't really explain how much i hate that shit.
10-16-2011, 11:22 PM #8
TornadoCreator
A Storm Approaches.
Originally posted by EZ. View Post
What if it's a puppy, idk sometimes the animal probably does like it but i still find that so nasty. I can't really explain how much i hate that shit.


Sorry... I can't imagine someone fĂșcking a puppy... I think I'm going to go sit in the corner and cry now.

The following 2 users say thank you to TornadoCreator for this useful post:

ChillChiefly96, IliKeDaPiEZ
10-17-2011, 12:00 AM #9
Pricey91
Professor of trollology
Originally posted by TornadoCreator View Post

The reason I feel it's important to recognise this fifth sexuality is all four of the others involve only consenting adults (or in the case of asexuality no-one), so no reasonable person can have an issue with them. But with Paedophiles, they cannot engage in any sexual acts without involving someone who by definition cannot give informed consent. This is a major issue, because in our society we ostracise these people without a second thought. People seem incapable of considering that "Child Rapist" and "Paedophile" are not the same thing, (oh and I hate the term "Child Molester", it's not "molestation" it's fĂșcking rape, call it what it is). A rapist is a sick twisted person trying to force themselves on others, usually to fulfil a power-fantasy. A paedophile is someone unfortunate enough to have been born with a sexual attraction to the only group of people they can't have sex with. There lives must be extremely difficult and they must feel extremely frightened every day. The world says how they'd slaughter "paedophiles" and how they're the scum of the earth constantly. Even smart, liberal minded people make these statements. This is why I bring this up, because honestly, how is anyone supposed to suppress these urges, come to terms with their desires and eventually get help from medical professionals if they can't even admit it to themselves without massive self-loathing and admitting it to even the closest of friends and family would make them shun them instantly. This isn't like homosexuality, paedophiles will never be able to stop feeling attracted to kids, so they need an outlet, therapy perhaps, and while we're making them out to be the scum of the world more and more of them are falling apart. It's common place for paedophiles to commit suicide when they admit their sexuality to themselves out of fear that they'll be labelled a child molester when they'd never dream of raping someone. This is the truly oppressed sexuality... the sad thing is, no-one can even stand up for them without being accused of being a child molester themselves, and that accusation terrifies people. Not me though, I'll always speak out for the minority.
Whatever way you look at it there's still a point where people need to understand what is acceptable. I totally get your point that they're born this way and that's what they naturally fell. In the same way, I'd like to smack fundamentalist Christians and tell them to stop being so stupid. It's just not socially acceptable.

Also, when does it stop becoming paedophilia and start becoming "normal"? There are many cultures around the world where what we'd consider to be children are gettng married. We all know what goes down on the wedding night. Should the age be 16 or is it more towards when the person has fully developed physically. Paedophilia could be a whole other thread itself.

Btw, well done admitting to being bi. Brave considering this place is infested with prepubescent kiddies who aren't comfortable with their sexuality. There's a joke about taking the thread by the balls, but I'll leave it :p
10-17-2011, 02:51 AM #10
TornadoCreator
A Storm Approaches.
Originally posted by Pricey91 View Post
Whatever way you look at it there's still a point where people need to understand what is acceptable. I totally get your point that they're born this way and that's what they naturally fell. In the same way, I'd like to smack fundamentalist Christians and tell them to stop being so stupid. It's just not socially acceptable.

Also, when does it stop becoming paedophilia and start becoming "normal"? There are many cultures around the world where what we'd consider to be children are gettng married. We all know what goes down on the wedding night. Should the age be 16 or is it more towards when the person has fully developed physically. Paedophilia could be a whole other thread itself.

Btw, well done admitting to being bi. Brave considering this place is infested with prepubescent kiddies who aren't comfortable with their sexuality. There's a joke about taking the thread by the balls, but I'll leave it :p


My point however isn't whether paedophiles understand what's acceptable, they already know it's unacceptable, the problem is for them to handle their urges in a way that is socially acceptable, though counselling and therapy, they need to be allowed to admit who they are without fear of lynchings.

As for what is considered paedophilia, simple... Does she have breasts, womanly hips, pubic hair etc. if so it's not paedophilia, by definition. Just because different countries have the law at a set age is meaningless. I knew girls who where 18 or 19 and where as flat chested as a 10 year old, I've also seen girls as young as 13 who are clearly womanly. Comparing celebrities, Chloe Morentz is only 14 years old, Selena Gomez is 18. I personally think they're both hot and both look about the same age. They also BOTH look too young for me but anyone who claims they're not both sexy is a liar. Look at how Chloe Morentz is shown off during photoshoots and on the red carpet. They dress her is adult dresses, off the shoulder numbers, provocative hair and make-up. Everyone knows she's being made to look sexy, but because she's 14 people refuse to admit it. That said Michelle Trachtenburg who played Dawn in Buffy still looked childlike at 17 to me and didn't have any effect on me really until she was in her 20's. The fact is everyone matures at a different rates. The first girl I was with was only 14 at the time, I was 15. We matured quite fast. Her best friend and my brother matured much slower, both not hitting puberty properly until they where 16. To claim teenagers aren't sexual creatures would be wilful ignorance. It should be obvious what is paedophilic if we look closely, anything that is clearly a child, acting like a child, because a 13 year old girl in sexy clothing acting like an adult... that's close enough for the monkey parts of our brain to go "Me Want" at least a little bit, if she's well developed. For it to be paedophilia, also, the person usually finds adults unattractive or at least unappealing. Basically, if you find yourself looking at the odd early developed girl around 13-18 or the odd guy 15-18 (boys mature slower), and being turned on, that's fine, it's when you look at their 7 year old sibling and feel the same way it's an issue, or if every 14 year old girl you see gets you hot, but you can't get it up for 24 year old women. Still you're right we could make this all about paedophilia is we wanted.

When it comes to other sexualities, I honestly can't understand why anyone would have any issue whatsoever... So long as it's between consenting adults, who cares. (PS: I believe the age of consent should be 15, which is the current AOC in most of Europe. It was the age I first had sex, it's the age most people start experimenting and when most people are fully sexually mature... USA having it at 18 is ridiculous, if you honestly think all those 17 year olds are virgins you need your head examined).

As for admitting my sexuality, I appreciate the vote of confidence but if others have a problem with it, that's their issue really. I don't hide my sexuality, never have, and I think I've even stated it on NGU once before. I look at it this way, regardless of what preferences the 12-year old kiddie trolls have I've had more pussy AND more cock than them, and that's fĂșcking awesome.

---------- Post added at 03:51 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:44 AM ----------

Originally posted by NullReact View Post
Sadly I think I'm leaning towards having no sexual attraction. I know you might think I'm crazy but lately lesbian porn is working for me. I'm not a homosexual either I have no attraction towards men. I think its due to my porn addiction I've been watching too much so Im getting used to it? Ahah, I don't know I have a really sad pathetic excuse for a sex life.. so. I don't know.

I rather not label myself yet cause Im still a virgin and aren't even an adult and you can't really tell until then. :confused:


Honestly, you're probably just "running on empty" if you get my drift. Too much porn can dull the senses and honestly, I don't watch porn for that reason. It doesn't turn me on, I don't find it sexy, it just seems fake and forced. Still, real physical contact with another person, where the focus is on a personal connection rather than instant gratification is very different. I think you'll find you have a normal sex drive it's just as a teenager your hormones are bouncing all over the place.

Also, a low sex drive isn't a bad thing. I haven't had sex for a little over 8 months now... I'm just not actively looking for it and I'm perfectly happy to do without. I know other people who are gagging for it after a week. I tend to find I'll have one, maybe two partners per year, and when I am part of a couple my sex life is quite shallow with only a couple of times a month suiting me fine. Never be afraid of your own desires and personal preferences, anyone mocking you for them is either doing it out of jealousy or because they feel threatened, but don't be so quick to grow up. If you're not ready to have sexual experiences... wait, no-ones going to care if you put it off for a while, sex isn't as hard to get as some people make out... you can always have it later if need-be.

The following 2 users say thank you to TornadoCreator for this useful post:

K5‎‎, Null ReacT

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo