Even though I'ma virgin I'm going to label my self hetero.I still feel the urge to fap to lesbian porn all day long..I like teh titties..But add Beastiality to the list Btw I think it's "Pedophile" I'm not sure.

Again, another person makes excuses for barring gay marriage because of stupid religious bullshit, to quote myself in a previous topic:

"Actually, 'marriage' was based of the pagan ritual of 'handfasting' which was to claim to be linked to another in a matter of loving betrothal and was performed for both heterosexual and homosexual couples as well as for non-sexual bonds who wished to celebrate their closeness, such as devoted friends or siblings.

As for the specifics of Marriage itself, it wasn't actually a religious ceremony at first but a legal ceremony. It was created by the royal and noble families of Europe during pre-medieval times as a way of reassuring a man that his children where is own as marriage was a promise of sexual exclusivity and infidelity could be punished as a crime.

Then there's the consideration that many religion have no problem with gay people marrying, Pentecostal churches for example would happily marry gay people if they could, so why should they not be allowed to as if follows the rules of their religion. Surely each church should be allowed to accept couples and turn couples away as they wish, and as such no government intervention is needed or wanted at all. Gay marriage should be legal, if a specific church is anti-gay they can refuse to marry gay people... chances are the gay couple wouldn't be going to an anti-gay church anyway would they.

Marriage is neither a religious ceremony nor is it a relationship. It's a contract between to people which legally defines each other as family and each others next of kin, there is NO reason at all for stopping gay people from engaging in this contract any more than there's a reason from stopping them owning property or signing a business contract. You're either ignorant of the details or marriage or a pathetic homophobe making excuses to exclude gay people, kindly think before posting."

Now, I would like to think you're not actually against gay marriage based on the apparent tone of your post, but this is a stupid claim that I wish people would stop making. If you honestly think your marriage suddenly becomes pointless because a gay couple who you don't know and who have no effect on you at all are given the same social contract options then that is a truly sad comment on your opinion of your relationships and their value and I feel sorry for your future partners.

---------- Post added at 02:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 02:33 AM ----------



That's fair enough. As part of an LGB society I met a lot of people who insisted on creating, often inventing, entirely new names for their apparent "sexuality" just so they could be unique. It was as though being an unusual sexuality was some kind of badge of pride they could wear. Really, I see little reason to use the term pansexual when bisexual means exactly the same thing. It can easily be inferred from the word "bisexual" that gender is not an issue for you and there are only two genders and you find them both sexually attractive, to use another term is doing nothing more than needlessly complicating an issue which could honestly do with simplification. With sexuality still vying for rights and equality in many countries, it's easier if we keep things simple, and honestly, even in a personal relationship I see no reason to complicate the issue with bullshit minutia based "sexualities" which are identical in all practical ways. If you want to use the term, fair enough, but in my experience, people who use any term other than bisexual when they mean bisexual are doing it for attention or effect, and often they're the "straight posers" just looking for an excuse to be "alternative" too which is a further annoyance.

By definition a sexual attraction to something non-human is a fetish, not a sexuality, but I suppose there's an argument for Beastiality being added to the list. As for 'Paedophile', that's the correct spelling in the Oxford English Dictionary, however Miriam-Webster spells it without the 'a', so I guess it's another one of those American spelling butcherings I hate so much like colour spelt without the 'u' or centre with the 'r' and 'e' the wrong way around. Honestly it doesn't really matter (but it won't stop me saying the American spellings are wrong simply because I said so).

I think it's pretty much pointless as well, it's basically just for convenience. If I were to say I was bisexual, I would also have to go on a completely different rant about how I could give two shits less about what sexual reproductive organ(s) you have, I'm going to like you for you.

If people understood bisexuality as the physical OR platonic attraction to multiple sexes, then I'd say it every time. But for simplicity's sake, and even though it probably isn't the best thing to do (because really, who wants to cause a lot of confusion?), it's just easier for me to explain a new term than one that people assume that they know the meaning of.

I'm working on that though. :y: It's more-so an anxiety issue than anything else.

Oh,well "Pedophile" is a slang version,and as for American spellings.They are not butchered words,just simply spelled that way due to the American Revolution.We broke free and made our own spelling system and own government.So the spellings here are correct.

Fair enough...

Also, pet peeve here... It's "COULDN'T give two shits", you said "could give two shits", which in fact means the opposite. The is one of the most common errors I see and one of the ones that really pisses me off, but I'm in a good mood and I like you, so you get this one for free. Next time though, you get beaten with reeds for your crimes against language.

---------- Post added at 03:14 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:13 AM ----------



You can say what you like, but as I said before, actually the American spelling is wrong (you missed the second paragraph as I added it in an edit, and you replied before I added the edit)

Technically, 'Pedophile' would be pronounced "Ped-o-File" with 'Ped' sounding like 'Bed' where as it should be pronounced "Pee-do-file". Also, as it's based of ancient languages (like most words) such as Latin and Greek, technically spelling it 'Pedophile' would actually be using the prefix 'Pedo-' meaning "to walk or take steps" such as 'pedometer', which means, 'Pedophile' actually means the 'brotherly love or sexual attraction of feet or walking', which is why American spelling changes are stupid.

Even though I'ma virgin I'm going to label my self hetero.I still feel the urge to fap to lesbian porn all day long

Your too smart for this website.. you must have a PhD in something..

I wish, did my first degree in Chemistry, dropped out due to poor health after my second year. Did a diploma in Computer Science (only a HNC for those wondering, took 8 months to do) a few years later. Recently I went back to uni to do my degree in Forensic Science and dropped out in the second year due to financial problems. This was a little over a year ago. Now my health is deteriorating so fast I will probably never actually finish a degree, and I always wanted to do a full doctoral PhD but things don't always go the way you want them to. It's actually one of my biggest annoyances, that I never finished University because both times I was getting high marks and likely to leave with a 1st Honours but shit happens I guess.

PS: Don't take my silly corrections, especially with things like English/American spellings, seriously. I may mock the American spellings but I'm only doing it as a light jibe (even if technically the American spellings are actually wrong if you know anything on Linguistics). I'm not really a Linguistics guy, I just find it amusing some times.

Well I'd assume your hetorosexual.As of today your actions incinuate that you are INDEED..not asking a pretentious question.BUT,flaming/trolling.....