Originally posted by PIMP
You are entitled to your opinion , just as i am of mine. Look at the bolds.
Being entitled to an opinion means nothing, everyone is entitled to an opinion... remember not all opinions are created equally and I like to think my informed and considered opinions are taken seriously. When people say things like, "that's just your opinion", they've already lost any argument they could make... but you're bringing up some polite points so I'll try to leave my pet peeves out of this
Originally posted by PIMP
1) As a gaming forum we fail? No we do not "fail" nGu receives a hell of a income , we have strong activity in the call of duty , auctions , battle field 3 , and more. Im not going to drop names here , but there have been cases of people saying the same thing your saying. In where they run on to make there own forum , where they will fix the "flaws" ( NO CFW , COD , Gay staff) . 8/10 they fail my dear sir.
Yes, as a gaming forum NGU fails on many levels. It has no retro gaming sections, no PC gamer community, actively bashes Nintendo (which you do later in this post), and focuses heavily on areas of gaming (such as FPS games) that most gaming communities look down on. FPS games are the new fad, they are to the last 5 years what Platformers where to the early '90s. Does this mean NGU is a failed forum? No. It's got a strong community that's growing every day. But ask yourself something, how often do you discuss games on here. Most of the regulars I know don't, not really. A passing comment in the Shoutbox maybe. As a GAMING forum, yes, NGU is a failure, as a general chat forum it's a roaring success. Just because the break away sites have never succeeded doesn't mean NGU is a success in any specific role, just that the spin off sites failed even moreso. I'm judging NGU as a gaming forum and honestly, I don't discuss gaming here... I discuss religion, politics, and idly chat, but rare do I discuss gaming.
Originally posted by PIMP
2) The call of duty franchise has a high demand , it has a very strong fan base , therefore if a lot of ngu traffic comes for the cod section , let the cod section have its space ( its not like is size 78 font and takes up 1/2 the page) . As for nintendo , to me nintendo is a joke now a days. The super mario i played , is not the same as the mario of 2012 . Super Smash Bros , is not the one from the N64/GC . Also , the only enjoyable exclusive shooter i have ever heard of from nintendo would be goldeneye. However , that is my two cents. I see that section more for nostalgia then actual wii stuff , where the age groups of 12-14 may have not enjoyed N64 nor GC Classics. Also , Wii has mods and call of duty. As for PC Gaming , i am not informed of it much , however i see nothing wrong with the section.
I'm not saying the CoD section shouldn't exist, just that it, whether rightly or wrongly, puts off many gamers. CoD has a bad reputation amongst gamers, and CoD players aren't gamers. Generally you get gamers, who play a wide range of games, but usually pass Call Of Duty by because of it's reputation and excessive hype. Then you get Call Of Duty players, who play Call Of Duty and almost nothing else (and when they do play something else it's usually Sports/Racing games like FIFA or Gran Turismo). Go on tell me I'm wrong, because you know I'm not. These people aren't gamers, they're "jocks" with a console. They're into sports, cars, and CoD. They're not into gaming, high fantasy, animé, science-fiction, and comics.... it's two VERY DIFFERENT groups.
It honestly pisses me off that people write off Nintendo as a "joke". The Wii and DS have had more original games than any other platform in the last 5 years and almost the entire library is different meaning if you own another console they feel different. Owning a PS3 and an Xbox 360 (or either if you have a decent gaming PC) is largely pointless because most of the games are multi-platform. The Wii has an entirely different library and an extensive back-library though the Gamecube and Virtual Console. Honestly, the fact that Nintendo is so ignored here shows the immaturity of the members because any group of gamers around their mid-20s and older will hold Nintendo in high regard. It's games like Call Of Duty and Battlefeild 3 that appeal to the 13-16 age group so much which ironically makes them more childish than anything Nintendo does... hell, the average Pokémon player is in their early-mid 20's.
As for "mod communities", I specifically ment PC mods. Consoles don't have mod communities, not real ones. The PC section doesn't so much have anything wrong with it, it's just too generic so it's not inviting people to post. Like I say, this is a criticism, not a rant about how everything is shit. I'm pointing out the flaws and every site has flaws.
Originally posted by PIMP
3) This site started off glitches and hacks , and they don't last? LMFAO good one.
No, they don't. People grow out of them and find something else to amuse themselves with. "Glitches and hacks" is not a hobby, it's a minor quirk and that's why it's not a sustainable model for the forum. It's also why the majority of people who post in those sections are new, none-premium members, where as the regular members post in General Chat and hang in the shoutbox. Is there a demand for it, sure, but it's not like fan groups for long running series such as Final Fantasy, which will have people discussing junctioning tactics in FF8, or where to find materia in FF7, discussions about favourite characters, storylines etc. that lasts. Another example would be Minecraft. People discuss their creations, post let's plays, have little competitions, private servers. It's a game that people talk about. Mod communities last too. People who make entire mods, graphics, PHP scripts etc such as the Civ IV mods or things like Counter-Strike and Gary's Mod. These things will keep growing and developing for years.
Honestly, I've made this criticism multiple times, and people always say, "this site started...blah, blah". I really couldn't care less. I started life naked in my mothers vagina, doesn't mean I want to repeat that now does it? Seriously though, just because a site get's popular for something, or originally started for something, doesn't mean it can't change and grow.
Originally posted by PIMP
4) How does one players trophies affect another user? Unless your referring to the trophy LBS , then i don't see the harm.
Because it's not just trophies. They're cheating at the games themselves aren't they? Be honest. There are threads all over NGU about how to cheat in multiplaying in games like CoD and honestly, I wonder why you all bother. I really do. As for the trophies, I honestly don't care, but it's a principle. I'm sure some games use trophies to match people of similar skill level for example, that system doesn't work if there's a stupid n00b running around with hacked trophies.
Originally posted by PIMP
5) If you don't like the content brought to NGU , i encourage you to leave the forum.
Really?! "Don't like it GTFO", is that the best response to criticism you can come up with... that's sad. Some people aim to improve things that they enjoy.
Originally posted by PIMP
6) Thanks give you rep power of +10 , also you want all of us to post 1 decent a thread of day? Maybe a week , a good thread takes time and effort.
Yeah, I know "Thanks" give's rep, that's the point. Honestly... yeah, 1 decent thread a day isn't that hard. It'll take about 10 minutes. I'm not suggesting 1 well thought out editorial article per day, that would be a bit much, but a decent thread, maybe 2-3 paragraphs to get people talking about something... that's entirely reasonable.
Originally posted by PIMP
7) if we add more emphasis on the like and thank system , then boosting will become a problem.
Yeah, but there's problems with everything... that's why we have mods. Rep boosting sucks, but I think it's worth an increase in rep boosting and a touch of additional work for the mods to encourage more community spirit and better overall quality of posts. You know what they say, you can't make an omlette without breaking eggs.