Post: 2010 Call of Duty title Confirmed
Options
02-10-2010, 10:48 PM
#1
NP Carling26
Trolling is a art
Originally posted by another user
Hardly a surprise - but publisher says it isn't resting on its laurels either to grow franchise
No, it's not a shocker: Activision has this evening confirmed that a new Call of Duty title will hit later this year.
The publisher didn't confirm if the game is a sequel to Modern Warfare 2 or, most likely, one of the historical versions of the franchise that visits famous theatres of war.
But what it did say was that while it doesn't necessarily expect the new game to be as big a hit as MW2, it expects further franchise growth in 2010.
The news came as part of an earnings call where Activision announced record 2009 revenues.
"We've consistently grown revenues for the franchise year over year and continue to do that this year," said Mike Griffiths, head of Activision Publishing.
No, it's not a shocker: Activision has this evening confirmed that a new Call of Duty title will hit later this year.
The publisher didn't confirm if the game is a sequel to Modern Warfare 2 or, most likely, one of the historical versions of the franchise that visits famous theatres of war.
But what it did say was that while it doesn't necessarily expect the new game to be as big a hit as MW2, it expects further franchise growth in 2010.
The news came as part of an earnings call where Activision announced record 2009 revenues.
"We've consistently grown revenues for the franchise year over year and continue to do that this year," said Mike Griffiths, head of Activision Publishing.
Original Article can be found You must login or register to view this content..
The following 35 users say thank you to NP Carling26 for this useful post:
+crazy, +sT IV_KILLER, AgentJon, Alekz, Alfa, BlogsterReviews, CamelToe, chrisdogg, Cpt,C, Doctor Stan, drunkenrepublicn, Ðewzy, ƒrizz, gamekilla, Helios, LilP, Newfie, Night Wolf, psp123, psychobe@n, Rage, Sert, SAM112, Sauceappeal, Slash2793, JimErased, Steve, Stub Hero, The Situation, xMacMiller, xScreamo!, xSKeLZoR, yacoboy
04-16-2010, 06:52 PM
#119
schaffinosx
To and fro the island.
Why is everyone singling out developers? Infinity Ward this, Treyarch that...
We all need to stop for a moment and realize that the developer behind the game is not always a key factor in how good the game will be, especially when it comes to the Call of Duty series. If we look back, we'll find that many people very much disliked World at War, and ridiculed Treyarch for producing a game that did not exceed that of Modern Warfare [1]. Infinity Ward was looked upon to be the savior of the series, to "one up" their competitors by releasing Modern Warfare 2, in which was to be a masterpiece.
Now, here we are again, but now, on the inverse of things, people are complaining about Infinity Ward, and many more people are looking at Treyarch to clean up the mess. This should serve as solid proof that, when it comes to this series, at least, both developers have their pros and cons, and neither of them have proved to be significantly better than the other (in my opinion).
In this series, I think the "better" developer is simply the one who takes the best opportunities, and re-creates the worlds most well-known conflicts in the most enjoyable and realistic way.
I just wanted to implement my opinion on this, because it seems people are once again taking the sides of developers, when I don't think that that is necessarily the right thing to do when it comes to this series, as each developer has a chance to make a great game, a mediocre game, and a bad game. That, my friends, is just something we'll have to wait and see.
We all need to stop for a moment and realize that the developer behind the game is not always a key factor in how good the game will be, especially when it comes to the Call of Duty series. If we look back, we'll find that many people very much disliked World at War, and ridiculed Treyarch for producing a game that did not exceed that of Modern Warfare [1]. Infinity Ward was looked upon to be the savior of the series, to "one up" their competitors by releasing Modern Warfare 2, in which was to be a masterpiece.
Now, here we are again, but now, on the inverse of things, people are complaining about Infinity Ward, and many more people are looking at Treyarch to clean up the mess. This should serve as solid proof that, when it comes to this series, at least, both developers have their pros and cons, and neither of them have proved to be significantly better than the other (in my opinion).
In this series, I think the "better" developer is simply the one who takes the best opportunities, and re-creates the worlds most well-known conflicts in the most enjoyable and realistic way.
I just wanted to implement my opinion on this, because it seems people are once again taking the sides of developers, when I don't think that that is necessarily the right thing to do when it comes to this series, as each developer has a chance to make a great game, a mediocre game, and a bad game. That, my friends, is just something we'll have to wait and see.
04-19-2010, 08:50 PM
#123
papa mudd
Pokemon Trainer
Originally posted by SchaffinOSX
Why is everyone singling out developers? Infinity Ward this, Treyarch that...
We all need to stop for a moment and realize that the developer behind the game is not always a key factor in how good the game will be, especially when it comes to the Call of Duty series. If we look back, we'll find that many people very much disliked World at War, and ridiculed Treyarch for producing a game that did not exceed that of Modern Warfare [1]. Infinity Ward was looked upon to be the savior of the series, to "one up" their competitors by releasing Modern Warfare 2, in which was to be a masterpiece.
Now, here we are again, but now, on the inverse of things, people are complaining about Infinity Ward, and many more people are looking at Treyarch to clean up the mess. This should serve as solid proof that, when it comes to this series, at least, both developers have their pros and cons, and neither of them have proved to be significantly better than the other (in my opinion).
In this series, I think the "better" developer is simply the one who takes the best opportunities, and re-creates the worlds most well-known conflicts in the most enjoyable and realistic way.
I just wanted to implement my opinion on this, because it seems people are once again taking the sides of developers, when I don't think that that is necessarily the right thing to do when it comes to this series, as each developer has a chance to make a great game, a mediocre game, and a bad game. That, my friends, is just something we'll have to wait and see.
We all need to stop for a moment and realize that the developer behind the game is not always a key factor in how good the game will be, especially when it comes to the Call of Duty series. If we look back, we'll find that many people very much disliked World at War, and ridiculed Treyarch for producing a game that did not exceed that of Modern Warfare [1]. Infinity Ward was looked upon to be the savior of the series, to "one up" their competitors by releasing Modern Warfare 2, in which was to be a masterpiece.
Now, here we are again, but now, on the inverse of things, people are complaining about Infinity Ward, and many more people are looking at Treyarch to clean up the mess. This should serve as solid proof that, when it comes to this series, at least, both developers have their pros and cons, and neither of them have proved to be significantly better than the other (in my opinion).
In this series, I think the "better" developer is simply the one who takes the best opportunities, and re-creates the worlds most well-known conflicts in the most enjoyable and realistic way.
I just wanted to implement my opinion on this, because it seems people are once again taking the sides of developers, when I don't think that that is necessarily the right thing to do when it comes to this series, as each developer has a chance to make a great game, a mediocre game, and a bad game. That, my friends, is just something we'll have to wait and see.
You bring up some interesting points,a lot of people thought MW was better than WAW, but a lot of people liked WAW better, and still do. Personally I'm not a fanboy of either studio. I have respsect for both of them. COD7 probably wont sell as well because it won't be as hyped or backed by its production company, Activision, just like WAW wasn't hyped up. I mean I remeber just hearing all the hype about MW2, and knew it was going to be trash, and guess what it was. Still made record breaking sales, but in this day and age that doesn't really mean that it was a great game, just means Activision knew how to play on the idiocy of consumers.
04-19-2010, 08:57 PM
#125
papa mudd
Pokemon Trainer
Originally posted by HEADSHOTDG2
treyarch and Infinty ward should get together when they make CoD Vietnam Because it has some mondern guns such as the M16 but some WWII guns aswell.
it would be cool for them to do a collaboration, but uhh... all the improtant peeps from IW are long gone...
IWI really hope West and Zampella are able to get back the IP rights for the MW title, that would be awesome for them
3 games with nazi zombies 
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
