Post: Sony considering charging second-hand buyers for Online Play
08-26-2010, 01:03 AM #1
Jake
One Man Army
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); While the second-hand gaming market is great for the consumer, it is of no benefit to the game developers, who receive nothing from the second-hand industry. This is leading to loss of revenue.

There are two alternatives for game developers, they either prohibit the practice of consumers selling their unwanted games, or they can take their new approach which is to charge second-hand users for online play. This would be done by having a single-use online access code to be included in game boxes. The original buyer would use the code, and subsequent owners would have to purchase a new code if they would like to make use of the game's online play.

You must login or register to view this content.


EA have been the first game developers to use the idea, but it would appear that this will soon be used across the board. Companies such as Sony are considering using it for their first-party titles.

Sony Computer Entertainment Europe President Andrew House recently stated that they are exploring the option for their own content. He said that they may have to either implement this or a blanket charge for online play, but they would 'struggle with [that]' as they would prefer to keep PSN's free-to-use policy.

Source: You must login or register to view this content.


What do you make of the idea of charging subsequent game owners for online play?
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 4 users say thank you to Jake for this useful post:

b0snian, billionk, NJN, zakaria
11-02-2010, 09:06 PM #83
I think it would be kind of dumb. We should be able to play what we want when ever.
11-02-2010, 11:50 PM #84
Default Avatar
Jeff
Guest
NHL 11 did this.
11-03-2010, 12:04 AM #85
Originally posted by Dave
While the second-hand gaming market is great for the consumer, it is of no benefit to the game developers, who receive nothing from the second-hand industry. This is leading to loss of revenue.

There are two alternatives for game developers, they either prohibit the practice of consumers selling their unwanted games, or they can take their new approach which is to charge second-hand users for online play. This would be done by having a single-use online access code to be included in game boxes. The original buyer would use the code, and subsequent owners would have to purchase a new code if they would like to make use of the game's online play.

You must login or register to view this content.


EA have been the first game developers to use the idea, but it would appear that this will soon be used across the board. Companies such as Sony are considering using it for their first-party titles.

Sony Computer Entertainment Europe President Andrew House recently stated that they are exploring the option for their own content. He said that they may have to either implement this or a blanket charge for online play, but they would 'struggle with [that]' as they would prefer to keep PSN's free-to-use policy.

Source: You must login or register to view this content.


What do you make of the idea of charging subsequent game owners for online play?


Whats the point though
11-03-2010, 05:16 AM #86
Jiraiya
Can’t trickshot me!
This is a lie Playstation would never charge us
Happy
11-03-2010, 07:23 AM #87
gamekilla
★☆NGU Member☆★
ill just go to fkn XBOX 360 Upside Down Happy
11-03-2010, 05:55 PM #88
Josh
League Champion
Originally posted by Dave
While the second-hand gaming market is great for the consumer, it is of no benefit to the game developers, who receive nothing from the second-hand industry. This is leading to loss of revenue.

There are two alternatives for game developers, they either prohibit the practice of consumers selling their unwanted games, or they can take their new approach which is to charge second-hand users for online play. This would be done by having a single-use online access code to be included in game boxes. The original buyer would use the code, and subsequent owners would have to purchase a new code if they would like to make use of the game's online play.

You must login or register to view this content.


EA have been the first game developers to use the idea, but it would appear that this will soon be used across the board. Companies such as Sony are considering using it for their first-party titles.

Sony Computer Entertainment Europe President Andrew House recently stated that they are exploring the option for their own content. He said that they may have to either implement this or a blanket charge for online play, but they would 'struggle with [that]' as they would prefer to keep PSN's free-to-use policy.

Source: You must login or register to view this content.


What do you make of the idea of charging subsequent game owners for online play?


I really doubt Sony will start charging for online play. They already have PlayStation Plus (which you have to pay for), so making people charge would make PsP pointless, and the most I think they'll do, is just make different game servers (one which you have to pay for, and one which is for freebies). Just my opinion though, depending on how much they charge, I'll start playing the 360 again.

~Josh
11-03-2010, 06:05 PM #89
Well, I know it's not a benefit for game developers, but, I buy a ton of used games mostly because I save up for accessories and stuff.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo