Post: GT6 Game Physics Testing
04-30-2014, 09:03 PM #1
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
GT6 Physics Testing & Analysis

These are Post of Interest

You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.




Lap Battles
You must login or register to view this content.

Here are some videos (I can only add 2 so Ill link post where videos are posted when I can)



(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 9 users say thank you to SiNiST3R for this useful post:

Jounijkk, kazzbakkisback, nextgole, OdeFinn, P$ycho, policedu, q-k, turbo_nova2l, tyronekfc
11-24-2014, 05:22 AM #245
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
11-24-2014, 02:56 PM #246
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Ford Focus ST 2013 @ Streets of Willow
All Stock / Stock Tires / zero ABS & TCS / G27 6 gate and clutch / Rac3rX Focust ST Tranny Fix

You must login or register to view this content.

Close enough?


Yup flagged and banned at GTP again, so I guess cue the SiNiST3R GTP rant lol

YZF is on me nerves, the little F4G got caught stuck in some bullshit, Hes talking Motec data, but not showing any screen grab from it. I ask for the screen shot of the motec data and so he flags me to the mods and waits for me to get banned, then talks some shit right after about not needing to show any of the data I can do the test myself........ This turd bag is talking like he doesn't have half a brain for half a thought.

GTP is plagued with these type of fools. They like to do all kinds of elaborate test and talk a lot of shit about physics real vs GT6 etc, but they never post any of the actual test data, they only post their interpretations of the data. Ill say it straight up, interpretations of data without the raw data being interpreted is the sign of some BULLSHIT. I don't give a fuck about their fucking half wit interpretations that they have no real business making, and if they don't show, better yet refuse to show the raw data they are interpreting, then they are talking fucking shit like assholes taking a dump.

This Motec compatibility is out and the Tuning Gurus at GTP are fucking silent, WTF come on what the fuck happened to all their talk??????? Cough, Achooo, BULLSHIT! Sorry, I'm allergic to Bullshit.

Im a problem for GTP because I back up every fucking thing I say, I wont do test then hide the data like a fucking AssClown. I post data like you see here and the chump punks don't know what to say. YZF doesn't even get a cheek, no no no, pucker up for my pucker hole AssClown either back up what you say or NOTHING you say has ANY value........... A post from YZF is worth the same as Toe-Jam.
11-24-2014, 06:50 PM #247
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
YZF is trashing 0-300 klm/h times now, and using real world test with Motec not showing his Motec data though lol

BUUUUUUUT


YZF did you even look at the track those test were done on? This is why if you post stuff like your posting you need to post some better sources. I had to translate the page, then sniff through it to find out what track they tested on and then I found the video of the test session....

People take this time to realize what YZF has posted is misleading information. Do not take test results at face value with no data to back it up other then what the poster writes. If some data is to be considered and the poster refuses to post his test data, its not worth taking into consideration.

The Track they did these test on was not a full straight from start to top speed, there is a straight that hits a banked loop back down a straight. This is IN NO WAY a representation of the cars 0-300klm abilities but more a comparison of those cars ON THAT TRACK, since all cars are under the same conditions its still a good comparison, but the only useable data from those test is the 0-100, 0-200 & 100-0 the 0-300 is useless and so is the 0-300-0, even the 0-100 and 0-200 is questionable........

You must login or register to view this content.

No wonder the 0-300 times are so far off, the times in GT6 are done on a Flat Straight, no banked corners involved.
11-24-2014, 07:07 PM #248
shmogt
Keeper
pretty cool to see the data tracker, nice

The following user thanked shmogt for this useful post:

SiNiST3R
11-24-2014, 07:39 PM #249
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Whatever Homo Moderator at GTP keeps deleting the post proving the track used in those 0-300-0 test was not a flat straight but had a banked corner and so in no way can be used to compare 0-300-0 on a flat straight is an idiot. Moderators like that Dipshit are the reason so many people are confused at GTP thinking every thing is backwards, what a fucking moron.

I wonder if the homos using the Data will acknowledge their testing has been completely fucking wrong based off incorrect data. Lets see if they go so far as to source good data to work with. Or even better keep using that data as if its not been proven incorrect so they can keep on misleading people.
11-24-2014, 08:49 PM #250
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Its weird how they act like because the proof was deleted and contradicts there "OMG GT6 is sooooo broken" its as if nothing happened, the shit gets ignored. I wonder if any of them at GTP will acknowledge that the 0-300-0 data they used was bad data for 0-300-0 test in game on a flat straight. They love to jump on anything negative without even looking at the data, its a fucking joke, but anything that contradicts their ass backwards beliefs they act as if its non existent or somehow non applicable.

Looks like in classic GTP style the Dipshits all talking shit using bad data because they just dont know any better are ghost, they will probably act as if nothing happened, wait a little bit then keep on trucking with their bad data, its like they are intentionally misleading people, I don't get is why they fuck they are so fixated on misleading people with Bullshit, are they trying to look smart?
11-25-2014, 04:18 AM #251
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
To test a theory out this is what I've done.

GTP is under the belief that cars are accelerating twice as fast as they should be from 200km/h to 300km/h

You must login or register to view this content.

They are comparing acceleration in the game to data @YZF posted from a web site that did a 0-300-0 test of many of the current supercars available in GT6 with detailed posted results.

You must login or register to view this content.

The problem is the test in real life were done on a banked corner and not on a flat straight like the times in GT6 are being done. The cars will not accelerate at the same rate while making a banked corner.

I prove this by posting a video the web site made of them doing the speed runs and it clearly shows the test being done on a banked corner.

You must login or register to view this content.

I posted this info a few times at GTP and each time inside minutes the moderators delete the post.

My test is that I sent all members involved in the topic a PM containing all info including the video. This way if they continue on using that data comparing real work acceleration on a banked corner to GT6 acceleration on a flat straight its clear without a doubt they are overlooking the truth to keep up their facade. Only a fucking idiot or somebody deliberately trying to mislead people would ignore the truth and continue pushing bogus information knowing its wrong.

Guess what, so far JohnnyPenso is trying to push the Bullshit saying the test prove GT6 acceleration is broken accelerating twice as fast as real life, he ignores the real world test was done on a banked corner and in GT6 its a flat straight. If he is this deliberately misleading people on this point its most probable he's doing it in other topics too (not probable, factual actually) what a Douche.

JohnnyPennso
Originally posted by another user
YZF has already proven the top speed physics are way, way off, so far off it's arcade level off.


This is why I'm so hard on GTP, deliberate misleading causing mass confusion.
11-25-2014, 01:28 PM #252
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Over at the playstation forums a guy from MoteC posted in my thread



Originally posted by another user
the MoTeC i2 software is free to download, there are no fees at all to use it with gt6.

We made a small error on linking to i2 Standard. Either i2 Standard or i2 Pro will work with GT6, We will get the link fixed to point to the correct software.

i2 Pro is the fully featured analysis tool that I expect that most GT6 players will use.

-jamie @ MoTeC


Nice to get a responce, Ive asked a few questions, I wonder if Ill get some answers
11-25-2014, 07:32 PM #253
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Lexus LFA Performance Testing

You must login or register to view this content.

You must login or register to view this content.


LFA Real World Performance

0-97 km/h (60 mph) 3.6 secs (w/ launch control.)

0-160 km/h (100 mph) 7.6 sec

0-201 km/h (125 mph) 11.4 sec

0-261 km/h (162 mph) 21.2 sec

Braking
113–0 km/h (70–0 mph) 48 m (156 ft)

400 m (1⁄4 mi) 11.6 sec (@ 201 km/h (125 mph))





LFA GT6 STOCK Performance Test In Game with MoTeC i2 Pro

Test 1 using TCS Set to 1 to simulate Launch Control

0-60mph = 3.94 sec

0-100 = 7.86 sec

0-125 = 11.43 sec

0-162 = 18.96 sec

Braking
113–0 km/h (70–0 mph) 47.24 m (155 ft)

7894ft - 8049ft


400 m (1⁄4 mi) 11.96 sec (@ 206.1 km/h (128.1mph))


MoTeC Data Video On the way

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo