Post: GT6 Game Physics Testing
04-30-2014, 09:03 PM #1
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
GT6 Physics Testing & Analysis

These are Post of Interest

You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.




Lap Battles
You must login or register to view this content.

Here are some videos (I can only add 2 so Ill link post where videos are posted when I can)



(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 9 users say thank you to SiNiST3R for this useful post:

Jounijkk, kazzbakkisback, nextgole, OdeFinn, P$ycho, policedu, q-k, turbo_nova2l, tyronekfc
05-17-2015, 10:58 PM #641
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Originally posted by bread82 View Post
Hi SiNiST3R,

I've just driven your golf at Monaco.

Couple of things:

95% of the time I drive FR cars, and not on Monaco, so I'm definitely a fish out of water. Best lap so far for me is 1'55.5 (no ABS). Sadly I'm on DS3 as the DFGT attracts too much attention from my 2 yr old!

I really like the mid corner and exit behaviour on this car. To begin with I was pushing it too much, trying to get on the gas too early and having to jump back off to bring the nose into line again. When I'd forced myself to calm down I realised how nice this car feels at part throttle operation. "Slow is smooth and smooth is fast".

One thing I am really struggling with is turn in under braking: I'm getting understeer, struggling to get the car to rotate with trail braking, (but a bit of lift off oversteer seems easy to come by). I'm therefore getting nearly all of my braking done in a straight line, turning in with very light or no trail braking, reapplying gas and then lifting off if necessary to mid-corner correct. I noticed on your video that on several corners you don't brake at all, just lift off the throttle. I was able to drive a bit better with the rear brake balance raised to 8 as I could be a bit more aggressive on the brakes upon entry. Are there any techniques you would recommend? Did you consider other brake distributions when you tuned the car?


Use lift oversteer. In the video I posted I try to show my flick maneuver. I lift and toss, try to get more braking done on the straight vs trail braking into the corner. I get most braking done before the corner lift + toss - ease into the throttle and increase throttle as I reduce steering angle. Think of it like zero pedal input has the most rotation, this is a character of this style of tune. Whats good as as soon as you hit your rotation mark getting into the throttle helps to steer you out. The set up Im running is known to be a pita to trail brake. Go neutral to apex (no throttle no brake) and have more rotation than you need, use the throttle to keep rotation in check.

What you can do to help a little bit of braking rotation is raise the rear brake balance while doping the front, BUT do so carefully and slowly because the tail will start to bite you. Id say Brakes 3/7 would be worth a shot



Spot on, the set up rewards smoooth driving, smooth is fast.
05-18-2015, 07:17 AM #642
OdeFinn
Bounty hunter
Originally posted by SiNiST3R View Post
Front toe is always up in the air from car to car because of the ackerman effect on the steering. Different wheel tract and ackerman bars will vary front toe settings, however toe is used as a kind of blend setting, it too is set up very much like camber when tracking the car using temps and wear patterns what the settings ends up doing is blending the other suspension settings together. We use it to refine the handling of our set up.


There is good answer for different toe settings as well as variety of camber on front, tied together, values depends Ackerman effects, where it spreads(toe out) or joins(toe in) driving angle of front tires.

The following user thanked OdeFinn for this useful post:

SiNiST3R
05-18-2015, 02:27 PM #643
Jounijkk
Do a barrel roll!
Thank You for excellent answers.

Very good tuning lesson for me and I think it's the same with other readers. It's very good to have deep background information of tuning principles.

BRZ seems to be ok. Too early to answer yet, I have just kissed the car.

Jounijkk

The following user thanked Jounijkk for this useful post:

SiNiST3R
05-19-2015, 01:13 AM #644
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Originally posted by Johnnypenso View Post
As you can see from your own links, I asked him to post the settings since he said only one setting was missing (it's in the brackets you quoted). Asked, not begged. And then after saying only one setting was not accurate, when questioned, all of a sudden not just one setting is off, many are off. It's flamebaiting, that's all it is. You throw out the bait, hope someone bites, then you shut the door.

"Look one setting is off, PM for the answer"
"If it's just one setting why don't you just post it so we can all see it"
"It's not just one setting and so now I'm going to play the martyr card and claim to be all butthurt because some people disagreed with me online, so you can only have this secret information through a PM"


It's childish games, that's all it is.


Who the Fuck cares, but since you need things spelled out always I will accommodate you.

You twist words

Originally posted by Johnnypenso View Post
"Look one setting is off, PM for the answer"


Ridox ACTUALLY posted

Originally posted by Ridox
"""PM me if you want the real car setup ( caster, spring rate, tire pressure, LSD specs- preload, ramp angle/lock ratio, sway bars, camber and toe, damper for dry /wet - will need to adapt as the real one has adjustments in clicks ) The stock clio setup in pcars is not really accurate ( one of the suspension parameter uses previous gen clio cup ), it should be at least interesting to try the base setup provided by Renault Sport. I might also be able to help with Lancer FQ400""""


The sentence you seem to have misunderstood (always you fuck something up) is

Originally posted by Ridox
""""The stock clio setup in pcars is not really accurate ( one of the suspension parameter uses previous gen clio cup )""""


Where Ridox says

Originally posted by Ridox
"The stock clio setup in pcars is not really accurate"


he never said One setting only was off, However he added

Originally posted by Ridox
"""( one of the suspension parameter uses previous gen clio cup )"""""


Explaining that ONE OF the errors FOR EXAMPLE is

Originally posted by Ridox
"""one of the suspension parameter uses previous gen clio cup""""


I guess he means its using a setting from a older version of the car..

He doesn't say only one thing is wrong, he says the set up is wrong and gives one example Winky Winky

Your saying hes flame baiting you? Are you kidding me Mr King Fucking Troll Flame MasterBaiter... On Second thought naw I was wrong, you said

Originally posted by JohnnyPenso
It's flamebaiting, that's all it is. You throw out the bait, hope someone bites, then you shut the door.


Ahh thats your tactic of Flame Baiting, well at least you have finally admitted to being a flame baiter and gave a little bit of insight on your tactics...

Really Tho, that doesn't mean a darn thing, its besides the point irrelevant.... You said

Originally posted by JohnnyPenso
"""Perhaps I'll return in a few days and share some gems from tuning in Project Cars when I take the Clio Cup Owners Manual and apply real world race tunes to my sim racing car in my racing sim. """"


But when we go look at the Clio Cup PCars thread at GTP your Beggin Ridox for the Cars real life settings... HAHA Caught AGAIN.

Originally posted by JohnnyPenso
"""If only one suspension parameter is off why don't you just share it with us and we can all use it if desired? """""


Well this tells us you dont have the owners manual, you basically asked Ridox for the set up lmfao... So yah gonna get your owners manual and post the setup Ridox PMed you LMFAO your a fraud, even over something as trivial as a Clio owners manual I found with all of 3 seconds in Google... WOW lmfao...

The only one playing childish game is you JohnnyPenso lmfao
05-19-2015, 02:52 AM #645
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Corner balancing is important, but this is what happens when a bunch of guy just give it a go...

""Yeah we did. Little (lot) twist of the spring collars and brought it in as best as we could. Hard when there's no weight at all. Unless one corner is an inch higher than everything else. And it did end up that way. All in the name of performance!""

Too long & complicated to explain myself here is a forum post explaining how to do it and properly balance the car while ALSO keeping the car level on all 4 corners with no need for one corner being an inch up...

You must login or register to view this content.

Originally posted by apk919
To properly corner balance your car, you need to have shocks with adjustable spring perches (i.e. Track Pack Bilsteins, Ohlins, Nitrons, etc.), and a set of weight scales. If you do this often enough, or are a car nut like me... you might buy your own set of scales; otherwise maybe you can borrow some from another nut.

The scales I have are from Longacre Racing; I've also purchased their roll-off levelers... that way I can compensate for my garage being about as level as the Arctic Sea during an episode of "The Deadliest Catch".

To level the scales, I use a contractor's laser level (Stanley makes a nice one for <$100). I set up the laser to be just slightly higher than the roll off levelers (10mm)... then I set each leveler to be an equal distance below the laser line by using the adjustable legs. I also try to adjust the legs so that the weight scales themselves are level on the leveler's platforms.

Now, since the weight scales are level, I can just measure the distance from the laser line to the car's chassis, adding the distance from the laser line to the top of the weight scale (in my case ~10mm).

Next concept... for those of you who might not be familiar with "corner balancing"... think of a four-legged table... if the legs aren't all the same length, the table will wobble. To fix the wobble, you can add a matchbook under one of the shorter legs (since it's harder to shorten a table leg than lengthen one). A car's suspension is similar... if there's a difference in the "height" of the corners, the car will not be as stable as if the heights match. The standard way to determine this is to compare the weight exerted on the left front + right rear wheels with the weight exerted on the right front + left rear wheels. With the scales I have, the "corner balance" is the ratio of the RF + LR weights divided by the total weight of the car. The goal is obviously 50%.

In isolation, tightening a spring (by lowering the upper spring perch) will raise that corner and increase the weight it exerts on the scale... loosening a spring (by raising the upper spring perch) will lower that corner and decrease the weight it exerts on the scale.

So if your corner balance is off, what do you do? If your RF + LR weight is greater than your LF + RR weight, you have the following options:

1. Decrease the spring compression of the RF (move spring perch upward)
2. Decrease the spring compression of the LR (move spring perch upward)
3) Increase the spring compression of the LF (move spring perch downward)
4) Increase the spring compression of the RR (move spring perch downward)

or, some combination of the above...

So what combination should you use?

This is where ride heights come into play. If your ride height is good, and you don't want to change it... doing all four equally should leave your ride height unchanged. Doing 1+2 will probably lower the car at all four corners, doing 3+4 will probably raise the car at all four corners. Doing just 1) will lower the RF and raise the LR, doing just 2) will lower the LR and raise the RF, doing just 3) will raise the LF and lower the RR, and doing just 4) will raise the RR and lower the LF.

Let's say your corner balance is good and you want to change ride heights...

Moving spring perches upward or downward (to lower or raise height, respectively) on adjacent corners (i.e. LR+RR, or LR+LF) has a minimal affect on corner balance while affecting ride height at those corners.

Complicated? Well, a little bit. The best way to approach it is to take notes, make small adjustments, and be patient. See if the adjustment you made affected the ride height and corner balance in the way you expected... if not, figure out what you did wrong.

This is an admittedly terse description of how to corner balance and set ride height... I suppose I wasn't sure how much detail to get into. In any case, feel free to critique, ask questions, etc.

EDIT: Forgot this... very important... always ballast the car before doing any suspension measurement. If you track your car and drive alone, ballast for your weight. If you drive most often with a passenger, ballast for both you and a typical passenger. Also, inflate your tires to their "hot" pressures. You might also consider disconnecting one side of your front roll bar so it doesn't bias the front weights.

EDIT2: This post is more of an explanation of the concept of corner balancing... I'll try to put together a series of pictures documenting how I set up my workspace and proceed to set ride height and corner balance. More to come...
__________________


Not really GT6 related but I hate seeing folks who run some Pay to Play racing doing some half assed tuning.. Like removing the door glass thinking it makes you faster to save weight... Turns the car into a parachute, kill the aerodynamics. When doing Auto-X his car is now BADLY affected by wind and especially wind gust changing directions, WHY, so can save a few pounds? Run plastic windows buddy AKA window weight reduction lol.. Next time Ballast the car, seems you didn't put any weight in the driver position and just left the car off balance and not level in hopes you might weigh enough to offset it but that was what you were supposed to do with the scales making it properly corner balanced..... Basically you just wasted a bunch of time, ""all in the name of Performance"" you say? Um, not really, you basically if anything hurt the performance...

Funny how nobody is aware he fucking goofed the job. You can have all the right tools, a Shop and a Mechanic willing to help you, doesn't mean your going to be properly tuning the car..... People just don't know, what they don't know... There are other issues with his set up, but enough on that, I think the point was made.. Honestly, I could help buddy tune his Auto-X Civic into a killer, but I got my own project going on this summer an I just cant waist my time on cars without enough displacement to fill a Coke bottle and hp numbers in "Race Cars" that is around 25% of what I like in street cars...
05-19-2015, 03:03 AM #646
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
Seriously though JohnnyPenso, if you have nothing to add to the conversation, if your only here to troll, or promote Shift, PCars AC or whatever you are not welcome here... Be gone if your just going to Troll here like you Troll GTP... Sorry Get Lost if your just going to as you call it "Flame Bait" to get some sort of childish kicks....
05-19-2015, 07:16 AM #647
gt416
Pokemon Trainer
Hey SiNiST3R, Johnnypenso is a Troll over at GTP because I know him over their.

The following user thanked gt416 for this useful post:

SiNiST3R
05-19-2015, 08:28 AM #648
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
I've never seen anybody devote their live to video games and Trolling like this guy lol. Some suggest he might be paid, but I dunno, I think he Trolls for free lolol

Round 3 done and we can finally drive the LMP2 online its gifted for completing the event.

The following user thanked SiNiST3R for this useful post:

gt416
05-19-2015, 06:36 PM #649
SiNiST3R
Samurai Poster
In a room online right now with the Golf..

Room ID 1472-4711-0167-3384-0372

Doing some initial runs for data acquisition. People are welcome to watch or join in.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo