(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); What do you think of the K/D ratio?

I voted for option 1, as I strongly believe that K/D is the most accurate way of measuring ability in the game. A higher K/D always means a better player. People with low K/D's aren't as good in the game as people with higher K/D's (in all cases) in my opinion. What do you think?

in tdm or ffa, kd is important but in objective game types screw kd.

I'm in between the second and third option. I have a high KDR, but I sometimes get outplayed by people with like a 1.5

yeah i kinda feel the same way but ive played since cod4 when my kd was .9 and now its 1.9 so its something that i think is very important.

KD means nothing, I'm only 1.42KD because I've been making montages since black ops has come out.

k/d does meen something but it can mean many things. it can tell you wether some1 goes for kills or plays objective.

My k/d could have easily been above what it is if it wasn't for the lag. K/D is a good measure but still flawed.

KD really means nothing unless you are an UBER TryHard and have to have a good KD to prove you are a good player. Me and my mates always muck about in CoD to have fun and obviously as a result our KD's aint half as good as they could be.

yeah shadow you have a point. it shows if you are a killer player or an objective player.

If you have a 1.00 KD in TDM but a 5.00 in Domination and a 4.50 Kd overall then that means something. Some people have high Kds because of objective game modes when they arent playing the objective.