(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); This debate occurs very often on the internet, mostly forums, but which country can be considered the winner? Which country is better and which is full of faggots?

I'm gonna have to go with America on this one.

Read it back, and see just how silly your argument is.



The guy was a social reject, he wouldn't have been anywhere near anyone with a gun if he was in this country, so he wouldn't be able to steal one. He also wouldn't have had connections to people who would sell him a gun, these people are careful who they deal with. They're not going to sell to any randomer even if he does manage to get into a conversation with one of them

We can argue back and for all night with this, neither of us putting forward anything but theories. I think it's best we just agree to disagree to protect the sanity of all.

I read it back; still the same in my eyes and in yours also.

How could he not be near a gun, if his neighbor was a legal gun owner who had a permit. He could steal it from them if need be.

If a criminal wants to sell something to get money for his crack habit, he doesn't discriminate who he sells to. They want money and they don't care who it is.

I agree; you have your views and I have mine, and we'll leave it at that. Thank you for the interesting discussion and for sharing ideas, as I do appreciate that. :beer:

He wouldn't have known the guy had a gun though, because he was a social reject. Again with the drug addict, that sort of people don't associate with drug addicts.



Was expecting you to say I'm just giving up then. :p Well done not using that poor argument

Aw come on, you thought I was gonna go that low? :evil:

I would have used it as one last cheap shot if I'm being honest :p

:biggrin: ...

LMFAO!! Great picture for that quote.

I've been watching this debate for a while now and I must say it's getting relatively interesting. I'm not ready to join in yet, but I'm going to clear something up about Nagasaki and Hiroshima. As mentioned before, one million American soldiers were predicted to lose their lives if we invaded Japan compared to the 500,000 CIVILIANS that Japan would have lost. But, wait a minute! That's not right! They weren't Civilians, and Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren't just picked as two random targets for shits and giggles. Those two towns were chosen because of the fact that they were war cities. In both of these towns were weapons manufacturing plants along with other miscellaneous war items including grenades, hand to hand combat weapons, ammunition, etc. So the people in these towns were contributing to the killing of our soldiers, therefore, not exactly innocent civilians. Just thought I'd let you guys know that before you justify something with information that is false.

inb4 flame

We have more gangs and they usually get their guns illegally. If we took the guns away, the lawful citizens would hand their guns in and criminals would not. Crime rate would go up.


Believe it or not, yes. With backround checks, of course.

If everyone owns a gun, criminals will think twice about breaking people's houses and/or robbing them at gun point.