Post: Battlefield 3 is Not Perfect
06-21-2011, 12:30 AM #1
Solo
Rookie
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); BF3: Better on PC
Source: You must login or register to view this content. // By: .Solo. // 20 June '11

Battlefield 3: Better on PC...


Ok, now that I've got your attention... Battlefield 3 is an improvement over Battlefield 2. Battlefield 2 was undoubtedly one of the best PC games of its era. I reckon that it still might be a favorite game to many players. You could play against skilled opponents, without ever going online with the game. There were many diverse maps and intriguing mods.

Now, you're probably wondering why it isn't as good on console, as it is on PC; or even why it's not perfect. The thing is, that Battlefield 3 will only run at 30 frames per second on any console, whilst achieving 60 on the PC. This may not be that big of a deal, but it's definitely something that will set it back a little.

Personally, I will be extremely happy if it is just a little more smoother and polished than Battlefield: Bad Company 2. No game has achieved perfection, so don't let this deter you from buying it. The least you could do is try it and see if you like it. :y:

I don't know if you've seen this, but this is the PS3 gameplay. Go ahead, jizz.


The following 4 users say thank you to Solo for this useful post:

FoxkaZ, H-Streety, HowsMySHOOTING, LiveLongDieHard

The following 3 users groaned at Solo for this awful post:

iNK Shot, KillaPwner, Slay No More
06-21-2011, 12:33 AM #2
ichris26
The Muff Muncher
Aren't all games better on PC anyway? Visually anyhow.

The following 3 users say thank you to ichris26 for this useful post:

iNK Shot, NeglectFate, snowaura1337
06-21-2011, 12:38 AM #3
boss10000
Like A.....
Games need to be better on cosoles, more people will pay £250 for a PS3 than £2000 on a Gaming PC, plus theres about 10:1 people on consoles to PC, theu will never be as good as COD, if they dont put consoles first.

The following user thanked boss10000 for this useful post:

XHaveNOFearX

The following 3 users groaned at boss10000 for this awful post:

FlutterShy, KillaPwner, Tree
06-21-2011, 12:42 AM #4
Solo
Rookie
Originally posted by ichris26 View Post
Aren't all games better on PC anyway? Visually anyhow.


Depends on your gfx card(s) and tv/connection. Awesome face
06-21-2011, 12:50 AM #5
ARVINLOCOx
Who’s Jim Erased?
hey jimmy is not that bad Smile
06-21-2011, 01:07 AM #6
0xFa1z
Splicer
Jimmy keeps yelling like a fag lol, it aint even funny
06-21-2011, 01:32 AM #7
Yozod
Bounty hunter
PC has always been better, graphics wise, than consoles.
06-21-2011, 01:44 AM #8
CRACKbomber
What's a CRACKbomber?
it wasnt horrible i think the graphics are still very good
06-21-2011, 02:10 AM #9
E0000B6FAF25838
Nikolai Reznov
Originally posted by boss10000 View Post
Games need to be better on cosoles, more people will pay £250 for a PS3 than £2000 on a Gaming PC, plus theres about 10:1 people on consoles to PC, theu will never be as good as COD, if they dont put consoles first.


It doesn't cost all that much to make a decent gaming computer. For around $500 (Something like £30Cool Man (aka Tustin) I made a computer that can run Crysis 2, Black Ops, Portal 2, and Borderlands at max settings. Also, PC gamers tend to be more loyal (aside from pirates) and play longer. Companies also don't need to go through Sony and Microsoft to do what they want with their games if they release them for computer.

But in terms of FPS, the human eye can only see at like 33.7 FPS or something like that, so there's only a small noticeable difference between 30 and 60.
06-21-2011, 02:20 AM #10
JewC
Big Sister
The host wants to camp lol.

Copyright © 2025, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo