Post: Battlefield 3 is Not Perfect
Options
06-21-2011, 12:30 AM
#1
Solo
Rookie
Source: You must login or register to view this content. // By: .Solo. // 20 June '11
Battlefield 3: Better on PC...
Ok, now that I've got your attention... Battlefield 3 is an improvement over Battlefield 2. Battlefield 2 was undoubtedly one of the best PC games of its era. I reckon that it still might be a favorite game to many players. You could play against skilled opponents, without ever going online with the game. There were many diverse maps and intriguing mods.
Now, you're probably wondering why it isn't as good on console, as it is on PC; or even why it's not perfect. The thing is, that Battlefield 3 will only run at 30 frames per second on any console, whilst achieving 60 on the PC. This may not be that big of a deal, but it's definitely something that will set it back a little.
Personally, I will be extremely happy if it is just a little more smoother and polished than Battlefield: Bad Company 2. No game has achieved perfection, so don't let this deter you from buying it. The least you could do is try it and see if you like it. :y:
I don't know if you've seen this, but this is the PS3 gameplay. Go ahead, jizz.
The following 4 users say thank you to Solo for this useful post:
The following 3 users groaned at Solo for this awful post:
06-21-2011, 11:02 PM
#41
Surikizu
GUMI fanboy
Originally posted by FoxkaZ
PC will always be better. No mater what technology you put in the console PC's can't be beaten. I can start to imagine this on my PC. 1920 x 1080, the perfect detail while the texture and other graphics options are on maximum. Console players really miss out on something.
Totally agree. Especially if you have top hardwares and good connection. 64 players!!
Originally posted by sithxnew
Looks like a lagfest TBH.
Just because its 32 and 64 players does not automatically make it look like a lag fest. Unless someone has a dial-up, vonage or turtles-speed internet.
06-22-2011, 01:20 AM
#42
northarmy
Haxor!
You don't need anything greater then 30fps, a human eye only sees 29.92fps
The following user groaned northarmy for this awful post:
06-22-2011, 01:25 AM
#43
A w e s o m e
Banned
Yeah pc gaming was always better,"Gfxs wise", can't wait for the game to come out.
06-22-2011, 01:55 AM
#44
Originally posted by Sniped
No sense of humor? I laugh at all of you 'Hackers' 24/7
Proving my point exactly
06-22-2011, 04:20 AM
#46
Slay No More
Who’s Jim Erased?
Sorry for the dislike but this thread is spam and pure opinion.
The main difference are probably the controls and small settings;
This is only an issues because you make it one, battlefield bad company 2 ran on 30fps. And it's not all that bad, try getting raped by 32 people during a spawn kill on conquest. Have you ever got killed by 12 people during conquest?
Shits lame..
The main difference are probably the controls and small settings;
- 1080p , 60fps on Pc / 64 players 32 v 32.
- 720p , 30fps on Consoles / 24 players 12 v 12.
This is only an issues because you make it one, battlefield bad company 2 ran on 30fps. And it's not all that bad, try getting raped by 32 people during a spawn kill on conquest. Have you ever got killed by 12 people during conquest?
Shits lame..
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
