Post: Battlefield 3 is Not Perfect
06-21-2011, 12:30 AM #1
Solo
Rookie
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); BF3: Better on PC
Source: You must login or register to view this content. // By: .Solo. // 20 June '11

Battlefield 3: Better on PC...


Ok, now that I've got your attention... Battlefield 3 is an improvement over Battlefield 2. Battlefield 2 was undoubtedly one of the best PC games of its era. I reckon that it still might be a favorite game to many players. You could play against skilled opponents, without ever going online with the game. There were many diverse maps and intriguing mods.

Now, you're probably wondering why it isn't as good on console, as it is on PC; or even why it's not perfect. The thing is, that Battlefield 3 will only run at 30 frames per second on any console, whilst achieving 60 on the PC. This may not be that big of a deal, but it's definitely something that will set it back a little.

Personally, I will be extremely happy if it is just a little more smoother and polished than Battlefield: Bad Company 2. No game has achieved perfection, so don't let this deter you from buying it. The least you could do is try it and see if you like it. :y:

I don't know if you've seen this, but this is the PS3 gameplay. Go ahead, jizz.


The following 4 users say thank you to Solo for this useful post:

FoxkaZ, H-Streety, HowsMySHOOTING, LiveLongDieHard

The following 3 users groaned at Solo for this awful post:

iNK Shot, KillaPwner, Slay No More
06-22-2011, 05:14 AM #47
thats so failarch like
06-22-2011, 06:36 AM #48
PC version is usually better but I like buying shit on a console just so I can use the controller instead of a keyboard and mouse.
06-22-2011, 10:26 AM #49
KillaPwner
Who’s Jim Erased?
Every COD on console runs at 30 FPS. Almost every game does. With the exception of BO which runs on 20-25 because they can't code.
I don't see why are you bitching about that, it's always been like that.
06-22-2011, 10:35 AM #50
Solo
Rookie
Originally posted by Slay
Sorry for the dislike but this thread is spam and pure opinion.
The main difference are probably the controls and small settings;
    1080p , 60fps on Pc / 64 players 32 v 32.
  • 720p , 30fps on Consoles / 24 players 12 v 12.

This is only an issues because you make it one, battlefield bad company 2 ran on 30fps. And it's not all that bad, try getting raped by 32 people during a spawn kill on conquest. Have you ever got killed by 12 people during conquest?
Shits lame..
News isn't spam. :dumb: Just because you don't agree, doesn't mean you have to groan it. I'm simply stating information. :p How is it an opinion though? It is not running at the highest possible FPS, even with its new gaming engine. One could expect a top FPS number in a game that wants to be a series benchmark. Therefore, it is not perfect; which is the only point I was trying to get across.

And no, I gave up on Black Cawks. But when I play, it'll be TDM, CTF, or SnD.
06-22-2011, 10:40 AM #51
viralhysteria
74261700027
Thanks for posting, I knew it wouldn't be perfect :(
06-22-2011, 10:45 AM #52
K-Snody
Loading... ████████] 99%
yes it is Smile ....

---------- Post added at 11:45 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:44 AM ----------

yeah its better on pc Smile
06-22-2011, 07:15 PM #53
NeglectFate
[b][move]NGU - Home of The Virgins![/b][/move]
Misleading title much? No

The following user thanked NeglectFate for this useful post:

Slay No More
06-22-2011, 09:00 PM #54
If you have a decent gaming PC then you'll have better graphics
06-22-2011, 10:30 PM #55
Solo
Rookie
Originally posted by Neglect
Misleading title much? No


Interesting, attention-grabbing title much? Who would wanna read, Battlefield 3: It only plays at 30 FPS on console, but 60 FPS on PC!

Copyright © 2025, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo