`I have a good example of Members just straight up instigating and being compete Douche Bags to another member, one who just has a different opinion to the GTP hate on PD crowd. This member is properly explaining himself without being rude at all (as I would have been) and old members and then a moderator comes in attacking him and backs up the instigator as if the instigator is justified, adding to his idiocy, the Moderator actually goes on the attack, attacking the victim.....
This shows that ar GTP there is a Protected Hate on PD Mentality. The GTP CAPITAL TROLL JohnnyPenso probably one of if not the biggest Troll Douche bag on GTP, can Troll anybody who likes GT6. This guy has no life at all, he actually doesn't like GT6 at all, there is not one thing he has good to say about the game, yet he is on GTP talking GT6 24/7 there is not many General Chat or Tuning issue topics he doesn't give his worthless 2 cents on and nothing he ever says is ever worth reading. This dumb POS has flame bated So may into getting banned and its clear he has Moderator Protection while doing so. This goes to show just how bad the management at GTP is.
Lets Look at this example where before they go in and clean the thread to make themselves not look like the Douchbags they are.
It allstarted with this post
Originally posted by jimipitbull
Indeed. With Bathurst, it feels more complete than any previous GT title.
Compare content to Forza 5, and GT6 feels twice as complete. The sales figures confirm this - GT6 has sold twice as many as FM5
Doesnt seem like something worth starting BS over, but here's how it went.
Originally posted by Imari
"Complete"
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Imari is in the process of shit talking GT6 for lack of CM & BSpec with the usual, they lied to me BS talking about it was a detail advertised when he pre-orderred the game, what a fucking idiot. Learn to look into what you buy before you pay for it and you wont be stuck with buyers remorse so damn often
Anyways
Its pretty clear his original statement was a reflection of his opinion of what makes the game compete to him. I could say no racing game is complete without a course maker, but that's just my opinion.I personally am of the opinion GT6 is complete and the CM is an ADDITIONAL feature, and IMO additional content compliments a complete game adding to it and hens called "Additional" Content.
He explains himself just digging up some definitions of the word "complete" because this is how fucking retarded Imari is. When these idiots don't have anything real to speak on they try to invent bullshit. jimipitbull should not of even had to but he did, and it doesn't stop there.
Mr JohnnyPenso has to give his worthless 2 cents
Originally posted by JohnnyPenso
Selective quoting once again. Perhaps the full quote will shed a different light.
Your first definition:
Complete: (often used for emphasis) to the greatest extent or degree
The actual quote:
(often used for emphasis) to the greatest extent or degree; total.
"a complete ban on smoking"
synonyms: absolute, out-and-out, utter, total, real, downright, thoroughgoing,veritable, prize, perfect, unqualified, unmitigated, sheer, arrant, full-out
"a complete fool"
Bold is my emphasis.
The second was a little harder to find. Your selective quote:
Complete: having (something) as an additional part or feature.
That actual quote:
Heading:
Definition of complete in English:
ADJECTIVE
Having all the necessary or appropriate parts:a complete list of courses offered by the universityno woman’s wardrobe is complete without this pretty top
[Subsection] 1.2 (complete with) Having (something) as an additional part or feature:the house comes complete with gas central heating and double glazing
It's amazing how one easy it is to twist the meanings of things through selective quoting don't you agree?
Emphasis mine again.
Just riding buddies ass over the definition of the word "complete" that he IN FACT used correctly. Hes keeping his cool in the face of JohnnyPenso on the attack.
Originally posted by jimipitbull
Cool story Johnny. You are certainly the complete google warrior.
So True..
JohnnyPenso starts riding buddy over this fucking stupidity, the definition of "complete" and then the accusations start up. Accusing jimipitbull of deliberately misusing words to mislead people maliciously....
Originally posted by JohnnyPenso
It's always worth a minute or two to reveal deliberate attempts to mislead and twist your way out of things with double talk and misdirection.
WHAT THE FUCK?!?!?!?!
Originally posted by jimipitbull
Because I was trying to mislead my own opinion? Nice misdirection you have there Johnny.
Another calm cool response
Here is where a long time TOOL of a member Toronado swooops in to back JohnnnyPenso Up
Answering jimipitbull's post with a
Originally posted by Tornado
Yep
and JohnnyPenso adds
Originally posted by JohnnyPenso
You were making up a whole new definition of the word "complete", got called on it by Imari, and then tried to support your made up defintion by appearing to copy/paste definitions gleaned from the interent to suit your made up definition. Unfortunately, I also google those exact same definitions and you deliberately left out the portions of those definitions which didn't support your misdirection.
Is this guy for real? How is it more members dont see this guy for what he is a fucking TROLL and defines the term. Tornado is totally backing up JohnnyPenso so the 2 of them are riding this guy over some bullshit.
Originally posted by Tornado
Johnny, he's right you know. Similar to jimipitbull's display above, so many people misused the word "literally" to try to sound more clever than they actually are
So FINALLY Another member steps in to stop these assholes from trying to bully this member and he post a very respectablle post
Originally posted by Aussie
Something can be technically complete and yet still feel like there is something missing.
Jimipitbull said it feels more complete with Bathurst in the game.
In other words without Bathurst in the game he felt something was missing.
If to him it feels more complete with Bathurst in the game, then to him it feels more complete.
The comment is a personal opinion and should be treated as such.
Instead it's challenged like it's a sworn affidavit in Federal court.
I've mentioned before how some here take a single word from someones post and push it to the nth degree.
Yet another prime example.
Trying to add perspective and in all seriousness why are they riding this guy..... Because hes not shitting on GT6, its only safe to shit on GT6, heaven forbid you like the game OMFG.
So a un-involved member sees the bullshit going down and steps in to give some support to the guy getting a hard time by these 2 GTP Trolls (Yeah Tornado is right up there with Johnny as a Top GTP Troll, although Johnny takes the Cake as the King of all GTP Trolls.
What kind of thanks does he get for his very diplomatic post? He gets addressed by the moderator who has been in the thread for a while and the moderator supports the 2 fucking trolls as they bully this guy.
Originally posted by SlipZtrEm
That's certainly an interesting approach to take to defend someone's (unsurprising) choice of being deliberately misleading. But sure, let's run with it: it feels like GT6 is missing something. More specifically, it's missing something the makers of the game themselves said would be in it. Up until they either a) release it, or b) announce it's for sure not coming, the game is incomplete.
I've mentioned before how some here take a single word from someones post and push it to the nth degree.
Yet another prime example.
A member seeks to redefine a word by selectively quoting a definition to further mislead. Why would people take issue with that?
Is this fucking idiot serious? Yeah Ive bumped heads with this moron of a Moderator before for similar shit. This fucking turd brain doent seem to be smart enough to realize how much of an asshole he is, or its something he works hard at being, waking up each day thinking of new ways to be an asshole to people on the internet probably because hes a 5 foot nothing 90 pound runt.
Thankfully Aussy came with a Reply that SHUT THEM THE FUCK UP
Originally posted by Aussie
This is some sort of joke right?
CLowndes888 said
If a game is delayed so it can be finished, people complain. If a game is released on time but with missing content, people complain. In all seriousness, most of you should be feeling happy that PD has released something on time. For a so-called "unfinished" game, GT6 feels more complete than GT5. B-Spec and Course Maker are the last things I think about.
To which Jimipitbull quoted and replied
jimipitbull said
Indeed. With Bathurst, it feels more complete than any previous GT title.
Compare content to Forza 5, and GT6 feels twice as complete. The sales figures confirm this - GT6 has sold twice as many as FM5
Clearly using 'feels complete' figuratively to express his opinion in direct response to the post he quoted.
Someone decided to focus purely on the word 'complete' while ignoring the context in which it was used.
So once again Jimipitbull said
jimipitbull said
If you can achieve 100% completion, that would satisfy the definition of complete.
If one game has twice as many tracks to utilize towards that 100% completion, it would feel twice as complete.
What do you think it means?
But of course the intent of the comment was again ignored and treated as though he was claiming the game itself was complete.
And now there's a mod quoting the AUP because the definition of the word that was taken out of context is apparently 'false, misleading, or inaccurate'
Despite how someone else has claimed it 'was a little harder to find', all I did was google 'complete'. I got :
"having (something) as an additional part or feature." and
"(often used for emphasis) to the greatest extent or degree; total."
You must login or register to view this content.
To suggest Jimipitbull was 'making up a whole new definition of the word' is pure hyperbole.
And to claim those definitions are against the AUP is hairsplitting and clutching at straws at best.
SlipZtrEm said
That's certainly an interesting approach to take to defend someone's (unsurprising) choice of being deliberately misleading. But sure, let's run with it: it feels like GT6 is missing something. More specifically, it's missing something the makers of the game themselves said would be in it. Up until they either a) release it, or b) announce it's for sure not coming, the game is incomplete.
I can only assume that is your thoughts on the matter, because that certainly isn't what I said.
The way you have written it is quite misleading.
SlipZtrEm said
That's certainly an interesting approach to take to defend someone's (unsurprising) choice of being deliberately misleading. But sure, let's run with it: it feels like GT6 is missing something. More specifically, it's missing something the makers of the game themselves said would be in it. Up until they either a) release it, or b) announce it's for sure not coming, the game is incomplete.
It seems you are saying Jimipitbull's original post was deliberately misleading.
SlipZtrEm said
A member seeks to redefine a word by selectively quoting a definition to further mislead. Why would people take issue with that?
And to me this confirms that that's precisely what you are doing.
How do you come to the conclusion someone is 'deliberately misleading' when they are simply expressing their opinion?
He wasn't stating a fact.
He didn't claim GT6 was 'complete'.
He said it 'feels complete'.
And all of this overblown rubbish because someone decided to take a word from someones post and use it out of context in an attempt to ... I don't know ... be clever?
Ridiculous.
What happened? The 3 bullies left without another comment, and have not posted in the thread since last night. Its CLEAR they got SHUT THE FUCK UP for being such fucking assholes and exposed, they just jump ship. Wow, what character, these guys really deserve respect.........