Originally posted by Chrome
@NoMooreMercy
I respect your opinion; however, it is hard to speculate based on a few gameplay videos that show less than 2% of the whole campaign. I'm sorry, but you made a completely uneducated statement by saying that they just patched MW2 and re-released it as MW3. I highly doubt a "patch" could hold a completely new campaign inside of it. Here are a few of my points:
1. You say that there should be new graphics. In every sequel, developers make minor adjustments to graphics to maintain a certain level of realism. In MW3, they improved the realism of explosions, were able to recreate the entire city of Manhattan, added a new under-water environment, improved bullet sound so you can here the gun whiz by your ear, and added new located from all over the world. Note: this is only based on the gameplay from E3.
2. You say that MW3 looks exactly like MW2. Just because it looks similar, doesn't mean it's exactly the same. It is a sequel to MW2 which means it will maintain the same look and feel. Hence the name "Modern Warfare 3".
3. You say that from what you saw, MW3 has no improvements from MW2. You say that you didn't see any new customization or other features. Well, if you watched the gameplay, you'll see that they have added a new feature that allows you to switch between two scopes on your gun. Also from the video, you'll see that they have added a new grenade launcher and implemented changes into the Predator Missile. You can also see that they have added the abilty to swim under-water, expanding the environment from the city to the sea. You are complaining about how you haven't seen any new customization. Customization is for multiplayer and they haven't even released any major information for multiplayer. Robert Bowling stated that they're introducing new levels of customization into the multiplayer anyway.
4. Modern Warfare 3 is set in the same time period as MW2 and is being developed by the same company. Of course it is going to be similar. Plus, MW3 is introducing something completely new called Survival Mode.
5. MW3 is 5 months away and still in development. Only 20 minutes of campaign gameplay has been released. You can't even begin to judge the game. It annoys me that you continue to say that they have made no effort to change anything when the only thing you have seen is Robert Bowling standing on a stage playing a demo of the campaign.
1. Okay? So they were able to add some additions based off of the same engine with some cruddy tweaked features. All this engine has going for it is that the engine runs 60 fps on console, big whoop. A smoothe 30 fps is sufficient.
2. That's fine, but I guess I'm just really sick of Modern Warfare 2 & COD in general so you're right in that respect. Completely my own opinion.
3. It just looks like the same exact game, barely any recoil, the sounds of the guns are recycled (as are the looks), etc. I wish it was different, but it just isn't...
4. Oh so Horde? Onslaught? Nazi Zombies? Firefight? What's new here?
5. Because they haven't, its the same damn game with some weapons back from cod4.
Originally posted by lilnatsfan44
So you made a thread about NGU hating MW3. . . and then you talk trash about it. You are an idiot.
Did you even bother to read the topic? The point of the topic was to hear why people LIKE or DISLIKE the game and why so far. Goddamn.
Originally posted by Adam
this thread should be closed.
It's in the debate section... why should it be closed?
Originally posted by Clive
I don't get why anyone would talk trash about a game that isn't even out yet. "Don't judge a book by it's cover."
Because it's Modern Warfare 2 with a few little things added on, my prediction anyway.