Post: Should Human Cloning be allowed?
02-10-2011, 05:24 AM #1
dPaws
Hurah!
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Do you think human cloning should be allowed?
I don't, due to your remake a copy of a human that is already living or have lived at one point, they would be in constant pain wouldn't they. "Mentally"
That's my reasoning.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
04-15-2011, 11:58 AM #56
Ada Wong
So cute!
Originally posted by dPaws View Post
See, it's stuff like that, that will make in unfair for the clone, as they will have feeling too, and if you cloned them from what you are now, they will be just as lazy.

I agree with you 100% on that matter, because people can always change and maybe the clone would learn from the originals mistake or vise versa.


i dont care they are not me
04-15-2011, 07:12 PM #57
the stuff
League Champion
With the new frontier set as genetics. I believe we will be able to simply modify our genetics to what we want. We'll be able to create a superhuman with all the qualities that are desirable and/or acceptable to society.

If we can genetically alter ourselves, we won't need others' organs, we can keep renewing ourselves and live to be 200+ years old. This of course is way out there in the future, but I'm also certain it will happen at some point.
04-15-2011, 10:56 PM #58
Just4Hax
"I will speak ill of
Originally posted by BNPunish View Post
i dont care they are not me

How is this different than slavery?

---------- Post added at 03:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:54 PM ----------

Originally posted by koolkarpet
With the new frontier set as genetics. I believe we will be able to simply modify our genetics to what we want. We'll be able to create a superhuman with all the qualities that are desirable and/or acceptable to society.

If we can genetically alter ourselves, we won't need others' organs, we can keep renewing ourselves and live to be 200+ years old. This of course is way out there in the future, but I'm also certain it will happen at some point.

I don't think 200 years old, but we will become very resistant to diseases, and stronger both intellectually and strength. With the fact we have mapped out our genetics, it is one step closer.
04-15-2011, 11:07 PM #59
ρrodigyz
Cool story bro!
My argument is, if it is a human clone, will it be considered a human or a clone? Will it have rights?

There was a statement of using it as an organ factory. Every time an organ is needed, a clone will have to die.
04-15-2011, 11:08 PM #60
Just4Hax
"I will speak ill of
Originally posted by Prodigyz View Post
My argument is, if it is a human clone, will it be considered a human or a clone? Will it have rights?

There was a statement of using it as an organ factory. Every time an organ is needed, a clone will have to die.

Clones should have rights, therefore the idea of an organ factory is pointless.

Like I stated earlier, clones are pointless.
04-15-2011, 11:19 PM #61
nickyboy909
Bounty hunter
Ok I only read the first page but I don't think you guys know what cloning is....
First how do you clone some one? Well, what they do is they take the male reproductive cell the sperm, and put it with a modified ovum, the ovum has been modified in that ALL the genes from the woman have been taken out, therefore only the man's genes are left. I'm not sure but I think it can work the other way around too... any ways, so they empregnate the woman and as per usual 9 months later she gives birth to, well, you!
But it's not you. it's just an exact copy of you, but still original... if that makes sense.
cloning isn't some super sci-fi experiment, its just that^
The clone has all the genes and dna that you would... it would have the same fingerprint and eyes and what not... also the same interests and beliefs(although that is debatable) so therefore, even if he knew he was 'just a copy', which is rediculous because its just another human being with your genes, he wouldn't care or would be fine with it because YOU decided to clone yourself and are therefore OK with cloning, and so should your clone.
Also cloning doesn't draw out your own life, you can be and almost always are still alive if you clone yourself, so the mental pain argument is invalid and so is the drawn out life thing... whatever, I'm all for cloning. I'll read the rest of the thread and then edit my post afterwards.
I apoligize if some one already made this post xD

EDIT: Ok some of the posts made DO mention that it's really just birth and no different from any other childbirth. In addition to what I said earlier, this is sort of like envitro fertilization (spelling?) because it uses the same process except with the modified lady parts hehe
To reply to a few comments on the matter:

Originally posted by thebotguy View Post
No. No one should play god

Then i guess we should all stop having sex :P
I heard that really serious christians do not ever use condoms because it is against god's will. If you don't, then you are creating life which is as you say: "playing god"

Originally posted by jobush50 View Post
I dont think its good to clone, because it would stop the evolution of the human being.


This is a really good point... and if evolution weren't already in the crapper I'd totally agree with you and switch sides... but in the contemporary society human beings have made, the need to evolve at all has vanished because we treat all humans as equal, the stupid ones have just as much chance of survival as the highly intelligent ones, and the weak have just as much chance to survive as the strong... therefore no evolution happens anyway

Originally posted by NeedaLifeSoon View Post
Memory transfer into a genetically compatible brain would offer immortality.

Not quite, It would not be immortality because it's just a copy... that's like saying all bacteria everywhere are immortal, which is clearly not the case. Immortality would define a person living forever, which can only be done if he is immune to every fatal illness AND develops (somehow) the ability to replace cells just as quickly as they are lost. As humans age, the ability to replicate the interior cells diminishes and eventually it cannot keep up with the rate at which it's losing cells. This phenomenon is similar to a collapsing star. In Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time", he states that pauli's exclusion principle causes repulsion inside the star. The exclusion principle is that two particles cannot be at the same position and have the same velocity. So, as a star condenses by the force of gravity, the particles within the star become closer together. The closer these particles are, the more different their velocities must be. So as the star condenses further, the differences in velocities and therefore the repulsion, becomes greater
and the star returns to normal.
Below a certain critical mass (named the "Chandrasekhar limit"), the star the particles can no longer speed up (because of the limiting speed of light) so therefore the star can no longer expand, so the expansion cannot keep up with the condensing caused by gravity, This causes the star to collapse or settle into a state known as a "white dwarf", a super-dense star.

Originally posted by NeedaLifeSoon View Post
Imagine being a thinking human being and trapped in that situation??


I don't understand... what are you trying to say?




ok I'd reply to some others but most of the others were posted a long time ago Smile
04-16-2011, 11:55 AM #62
Ada Wong
So cute!
Originally posted by Just4Hax View Post
How is this different than slavery?

---------- Post added at 03:56 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:54 PM ----------


I don't think 200 years old, but we will become very resistant to diseases, and stronger both intellectually and strength. With the fact we have mapped out our genetics, it is one step closer.


so whats a clone for ? you pay for it if you dont pay no living? they should be thankful
04-16-2011, 12:10 PM #63
King Jamiɘ
Super Premium
I support cloning, ethics are a waste of time.
Is it ethical to ignore potential cures for many diseases and let people die.
04-16-2011, 03:37 PM #64
Just4Hax
"I will speak ill of
Originally posted by King
I support cloning, ethics are a waste of time.
Is it ethical to ignore potential cures for many diseases and let people die.

No, that is why we research cures. Ethics keep our society stable. If there were none, many people would go crazy. To me its like religion keeping people in check.

---------- Post added at 08:37 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:35 AM ----------

Originally posted by BNPunish View Post
so whats a clone for ?

That is my point. The best you could do is keep intellectuals keep having an effect on the world.

Originally posted by another user
you pay for it if you dont pay no living? they should be thankful

Thankful and slavery are two different things. That is like saying I should work for my parents forever because they brought me into the world. It isn't how our society functions. Slavery has ended because it is immoral to todays standards.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo