Post: EA Spending $100 Million To Beat Call Of Duty With Battlefield 3
04-07-2011, 07:00 AM #1
TheBigRod
uh-may-zuh-zing
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); EA Spending $100 Million To Beat Call Of Duty With Battlefield 3[/u]
Source: You must login or register to view this content. | TheBigRod | April 6th, 2011

So we all know how EA & Activision have been butting heads to be the best first-person shooter out there. But did you know that EA is putting $100 million into making Battlefield 3 better than the Call of Duty franchise?

According to the You must login or register to view this content., EA CEO John Riccitiello announced this investment in New York. He said that it will positively beat down the HIGHLY anticipated Modern Warfare 3. If they're putting this much money into topping one of the best first-person shooters of all time, let's hope it's worth it.

In my opinion, I think a game that took over $100 million to make should be worth it. I mean, a lot of people love Battlefield, but even more people love Call of Duty. So it's going to be a tough match for EA.

So guys, Battlefield 3 or Modern Warfare 3 to be the best FPS of 2011?[/color][/font]
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 5 users say thank you to TheBigRod for this useful post:

Beta-, Blackstorm, SilentFox757, Toon_Squad, ZachFean
04-16-2011, 08:37 PM #83
It's BFBC3 all day! Well for me it isSmile
It's always been about realism for me, and call of duty is more of a do whetever you want kind of game.
I like games where you need team work and skills.
Call of duty is all about who shoots first or who camps the hardest:/
That's my point of view:P "SUCK IT"
04-16-2011, 09:57 PM #84
PhYzIcX
Bounty hunter
the problem is cod has always 1upped battlefield...
04-18-2011, 07:16 AM #85
Beta-
< ^ > < ^ >
I Would do the same thing :p
04-18-2011, 06:43 PM #86
if mw3 is like mw2 without noob, commando, oma, danger close then bf3 gonna have to be good
04-19-2011, 01:38 AM #87
snowaura1337
< ^ > < ^ >
Originally posted by .DeaThSouL View Post
BAttlefield franchise has been pretty realistic, big maps,Squads, Vehicles....but CoD was about killstreaks and KDrs But has more Game modes ......


realistic.... hmmm shoot your car with a M16 till your arm come off, and your car wont blow up
04-19-2011, 02:16 AM #88
JewC
Big Sister
They'd beat cod by spending $2 lol. Cod sucks right now lmao.
04-19-2011, 02:30 AM #89
xDIMEBAG
I have a gambling problem
I just think it's a little to early for EA to be calling out a game when a trailer hasn't even been released for it. For all we know this could be the best call of duty and destroy cod4. But meh. Battlefield is more entertaining then cod now so they might take over.
04-19-2011, 03:51 AM #90
snowaura1337
< ^ > < ^ >
Originally posted by ntfe View Post
They'd beat cod by spending $2 lol. Cod sucks right now lmao.


i think.... buying a MARS chocolate bar is better
04-19-2011, 05:07 AM #91
T-Icey
Samurai Poster
It is not about how much they put to make the game... it is about how much they put to convince the 10 years fan kids of COD franchise. COD is nothing compared to Battlefield in terms of quality

---------- Post added at 01:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:02 AM ----------

Originally posted by nawking View Post
Ea is bout to make a 100Mill game fail. it will problely be as big of a fail as the titanic. Go Iw! go Mw3!


Just like the next COD? I mean not in terms of sales, but in quality... just like Black Ops, Next COD, and the next, and the next, and next...? Oh wait I forgot it is the same thing every year, so maybe we can't even call it "next COD" instead of COD v2.0001

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo