Post: EA Spending $100 Million To Beat Call Of Duty With Battlefield 3
04-07-2011, 07:00 AM #1
TheBigRod
uh-may-zuh-zing
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); EA Spending $100 Million To Beat Call Of Duty With Battlefield 3[/u]
Source: You must login or register to view this content. | TheBigRod | April 6th, 2011

So we all know how EA & Activision have been butting heads to be the best first-person shooter out there. But did you know that EA is putting $100 million into making Battlefield 3 better than the Call of Duty franchise?

According to the You must login or register to view this content., EA CEO John Riccitiello announced this investment in New York. He said that it will positively beat down the HIGHLY anticipated Modern Warfare 3. If they're putting this much money into topping one of the best first-person shooters of all time, let's hope it's worth it.

In my opinion, I think a game that took over $100 million to make should be worth it. I mean, a lot of people love Battlefield, but even more people love Call of Duty. So it's going to be a tough match for EA.

So guys, Battlefield 3 or Modern Warfare 3 to be the best FPS of 2011?[/color][/font]
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 5 users say thank you to TheBigRod for this useful post:

Beta-, Blackstorm, SilentFox757, Toon_Squad, ZachFean
04-19-2011, 07:00 AM #92
Call of duty will win it always does >.>
04-20-2011, 12:09 AM #93
nawking
NGU has sold out to money 8(
Originally posted by Icey View Post
It is not about how much they put to make the game... it is about how much they put to convince the 10 years fan kids of COD franchise. COD is nothing compared to Battlefield in terms of quality

---------- Post added at 01:07 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:02 AM ----------



Just like the next COD? I mean not in terms of sales, but in quality... just like Black Ops, Next COD, and the next, and the next, and next...? Oh wait I forgot it is the same thing every year, so maybe we can't even call it "next COD" instead of COD v2.0001

the blame for lower quality rests on actvision they keep rushing things into proudction because there money hungery.
04-20-2011, 12:48 AM #94
T-Icey
Samurai Poster
Originally posted by nawking View Post
the blame for lower quality rests on actvision they keep rushing things into proudction because there money hungery.


yea and also because they dont give enough to devs:y:
04-20-2011, 01:01 AM #95
x-GuNPLaY---o
Do a barrel roll!
I think both will be decent games.
04-20-2011, 09:26 AM #96
This discussion which game is better is still on?

Same thing as we compare an apple and a banana.

The following user thanked Njamimars for this useful post:

Booshykins
04-20-2011, 11:16 AM #97
Singlet
Save Point
Going to Fail Big Time, Nothing beats cod for sure. though im not quite sure now, becuase of the split up how the new creators are going to handle it. but i hopefully mw3 is boss overall, Cod is 10 years old.
04-20-2011, 11:47 AM #98
mw3 will win Happy
04-22-2011, 02:13 PM #99
oFarz
Bounty hunter
no matter how much they spend CoD will always be the game to buy, its like FIFA & PES
04-22-2011, 02:49 PM #100
Booshykins
Tech Enthusiast
Originally posted by oFarz View Post
no matter how much they spend CoD will always be the game to buy, its like FIFA & PES


That's all a matter of opinion, though. There are just as many people who would say the same thing you just did, but about Battlefield.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo