Post: EA Spending $100 Million To Beat Call Of Duty With Battlefield 3
Options
04-07-2011, 07:00 AM
#1
TheBigRod
uh-may-zuh-zing
Source: You must login or register to view this content. | TheBigRod | April 6th, 2011
So we all know how EA & Activision have been butting heads to be the best first-person shooter out there. But did you know that EA is putting $100 million into making Battlefield 3 better than the Call of Duty franchise?
According to the You must login or register to view this content., EA CEO John Riccitiello announced this investment in New York. He said that it will positively beat down the HIGHLY anticipated Modern Warfare 3. If they're putting this much money into topping one of the best first-person shooters of all time, let's hope it's worth it.
In my opinion, I think a game that took over $100 million to make should be worth it. I mean, a lot of people love Battlefield, but even more people love Call of Duty. So it's going to be a tough match for EA.
So guys, Battlefield 3 or Modern Warfare 3 to be the best FPS of 2011?[/color][/font]
The following 5 users say thank you to TheBigRod for this useful post:
04-22-2011, 05:33 PM
#103
ShinigamiUzi
Proud to be a Player
WTFFFFFFF
horrible , 50 million was enough !
horrible , 50 million was enough !
04-22-2011, 08:18 PM
#108
KingEric2011
Who’s Jim Erased?
Originally posted by Tristan
EA Spending $100 Million To Beat Call Of Duty With Battlefield 3[/u]
Source: You must login or register to view this content. | TheBigRod | April 6th, 2011
So we all know how EA & Activision have been butting heads to be the best first-person shooter out there. But did you know that EA is putting $100 million into making Battlefield 3 better than the Call of Duty franchise?
According to the You must login or register to view this content., EA CEO John Riccitiello announced this investment in New York. He said that it will positively beat down the HIGHLY anticipated Modern Warfare 3. If they're putting this much money into topping one of the best first-person shooters of all time, let's hope it's worth it.
In my opinion, I think a game that took over $100 million to make should be worth it. I mean, a lot of people love Battlefield, but even more people love Call of Duty. So it's going to be a tough match for EA.
So guys, Battlefield 3 or Modern Warfare 3 to be the best FPS of 2011?[/color][/font]
Source: You must login or register to view this content. | TheBigRod | April 6th, 2011
So we all know how EA & Activision have been butting heads to be the best first-person shooter out there. But did you know that EA is putting $100 million into making Battlefield 3 better than the Call of Duty franchise?
According to the You must login or register to view this content., EA CEO John Riccitiello announced this investment in New York. He said that it will positively beat down the HIGHLY anticipated Modern Warfare 3. If they're putting this much money into topping one of the best first-person shooters of all time, let's hope it's worth it.
In my opinion, I think a game that took over $100 million to make should be worth it. I mean, a lot of people love Battlefield, but even more people love Call of Duty. So it's going to be a tough match for EA.
So guys, Battlefield 3 or Modern Warfare 3 to be the best FPS of 2011?[/color][/font]
mw3 will be the biggest selling game ever when its released
04-22-2011, 08:21 PM
#109
t0asty
Web Dev / Security
The only thing that lets BF down for me is the sensitivity and movement. If they fixed that then i cant see why it wouldn't beat COD. COD is dead now anyway because theres too many fags. It was good when it was just a few people playing it, now everyone does its shit.
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
