(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
So my father in law(lady's father), builds and maintains government network servers. He told us on sunday that if he owned the psn it would be up on tuesday, have already caught the hacker(s) himself then warned all users of the network that he was going to start charging for the usage of PSN just like XBL.
Then he said, but since he doesn't own it, that the PSN will most likely be completely restored, without the hacker(s) being caught on the following tuesday. With more security precautions that they have to pay for so they will most likely will start charging users just like XBL.
Besides: "cool story bro".
What i'm actually looking for is:
If the PSN does start to charge but their servers are more up to par as XBL's are. Would you stay with ps3 and pay for the subscription, or would you say eff it and just switch to Xbox, because their servers are already up to par?
IMO, I think that it would be more worthwhile to pay for the subscription, see if things are better for alittle while, connection wise. If not I'll purchase xboxes and keep the ps3's just for the first party releases and play all the third party releases, on the xboxes.
So my father in law(lady's father), builds and maintains government network servers. He told us on sunday that if he owned the psn it would be up on tuesday, have already caught the hacker(s) himself then warned all users of the network that he was going to start charging for the usage of PSN just like XBL.
Then he said, but since he doesn't own it, that the PSN will most likely be completely restored, without the hacker(s) being caught on the following tuesday. With more security precautions that they have to pay for so they will most likely will start charging users just like XBL.
Besides: "cool story bro".
What i'm actually looking for is:
If the PSN does start to charge but their servers are more up to par as XBL's are. Would you stay with ps3 and pay for the subscription, or would you say eff it and just switch to Xbox, because their servers are already up to par?
IMO, I think that it would be more worthwhile to pay for the subscription, see if things are better for alittle while, connection wise. If not I'll purchase xboxes and keep the ps3's just for the first party releases and play all the third party releases, on the xboxes.
if we have 2 start paying for online i would without hesitation switch 2 xbox. honestly people look @ the 2 consoles, xbox beats out ps3 in so many ways. and if we would have 2 start paying for the same services that we still have.... sony would lose a good 60% of their customers easily!!!
The following user thanked moeinyoho for this useful post:
its called dedication, when things get bad, you stay with it, when things are good, everyone is around. but when its bad, youll know whose loyal to ps3. i WOULD pay for psn, but the sony president has specifically said, psn will be free. that is what makes it so different from Xbl. i hate everything about the xbox's structure, the controllers, the faulty cpu's. and having to use AA batteries to use the controller. sony wont charge for psn. if they do, itll be introduced in time, and users will be given some time to think on it,before they switch.