Post: We want less Killstreaks!
05-30-2011, 08:42 PM #1
oX-matto-Xo
#1 Chaos MW3
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Are you fed up of killstreaks?
Do you think killstreaks ruin the game?

Here is why I think they should keep there killstreaks to a minimum.


Killstreaks, bring interest into the game. But the game gets interested into campers! If you play a game like "Black Ops" 90% of people on their are Campers. They depend on there killstreak, meaning they do NOT want to lose there streak. (Which means, people camp so they dont get killed.) Alot of people I know lose interest in the game, because there are more people flying around in Ac130's/Gunships, than a noobs that shoot his bullet!

This also means, false statistic.
Yours stats do not fit the co-ordination of other players, A real FPS player, uses his gun. If you see someone who has a higher KD/R than you, this is only because they constantly use there killstreaks and CAMP! It does not mean they are better than you, so what is the point of the leaderboards when they are false statements?

If your a previous FPS player, who plays older games like Cod4 or WAW. You enjoy playing these sort of games, because you have spent hours getting used to your personal gun, and you become a good Player! For people who crave there killstreaks, you kill 11 people with a gun your not long term used to, then you gain a rediculasly over powered killstreak, you get place on top with 30/40 kills over something so easy to do, seriously whats the fun in getting easy kills?

Whats the point in buying a games, if you let the game get kills for you?

I hope MW3, wont be packed with killstreaks. This will avoid campers!


What do you think? Give a comment.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The following 21 users say thank you to oX-matto-Xo for this useful post:

||||||||||||, Classy., dkfallen, Domov, Friday15, Grumpy, IL--U--IK--IE, jakerad95, jdrain11, LiveLongDieHard, LordOlliee, Murt, Njamimars, Octavia, skillz369, tayen, TrytoYOLO, Wolf07x, wowaka

The following 2 users groaned at oX-matto-Xo for this awful post:

Porter_Justice, TheJaRniBoi
05-30-2011, 08:49 PM #2
--Ben-
I SPEAK MY MIND!
Originally posted by Xo View Post
Are you fed up of killstreaks?
Do you think killstreaks ruin the game?

Here is why I think they should keep there killstreaks to a minimum.


Killstreaks, bring interest into the game. But the game gets interested into campers! If you play a game like "Black Ops" 90% of people on their are Campers. They depend on there killstreak, meaning they do NOT want to lose there streak. (Which means, people camp so they dont get killed.) Alot of people I know lose interest in the game, because there are more people flying around in Ac130's/Gunships, than a noobs that shoot his bullet!

This also means, false statistic.
Yours stats do not fit the co-ordination of other players, A real FPS player, uses his gun. If you see someone who has a higher KD/R than you, this is only because they constantly use there killstreaks and CAMP! It does not mean they are better than you, so what is the point of the leaderboards when they are false statements?

If your a previous FPS player, who plays older games like Cod4 or WAW. You enjoy playing these sort of games, because you have spent hours getting used to your personal gun, and you become a good Player! For people who crave there killstreaks, you kill 11 people with a gun your not long term used to, then you gain a rediculasly over powered killstreak, you get place on top with 30/40 kills over something so easy to do, seriously whats the fun in getting easy kills?

Whats the point in buying a games, if you let the game get kills for you?

I hope MW3, wont be packed with killstreaks. This will avoid campers!


What do you think? Give a comment.


I agree less killstreaks would be good, and it would dramatically cut down on campers. However, killstreaks are in the game to add that bit of excitement and an edge to the game. I think more killstreaks the better, but make them not to over powered, and make it so there is no choppers/ac130 ect.
05-30-2011, 09:05 PM #3
oX-matto-Xo
#1 Chaos MW3
Originally posted by Ben
I agree less killstreaks would be good, and it would dramatically cut down on campers. However, killstreaks are in the game to add that bit of excitement and an edge to the game. I think more killstreaks the better, but make them not to over powered, and make it so there is no choppers/ac130 ect.


There killstreaks need to be more managed. Because a killstreak affects the whole game! Black Ops is a complete fail because noobs can get a GUNSHIP within 2 rounds of SnD and earn enough CP to unlock it. Then the camping begins!
I agree with your qoute "killstreaks are in the game to add that bit of excitement and an edge to the game" but dont you think there should be an alternative? Instead of focusing on killstreaks?

A Killstreak should be unlock by a Challenge, which makes it more harder to complete.

E.G.

Back Stab 5 enemies within 55 seconds - Unlocks UAV (No Teams Allowed)
Kill 3 Enemys by shooting a Claymore behind a wall - Unlocks Carpackages (No Teams Allowed)
Get 4 Heads in a row with an MP5 in 10 seconds - Unlocks Death Streak (No Teams Allowed)

(No Teams Allowed - Avoids Cheaters)

This gives the advanatge of people using there Gun alot more, it gives people the "feel" of each gun, and makes them more insterested into battle, instead of camping in the corner. It also shows how good you are by how well you complete challenges in battle.

Qoutes:

A killstreak should give you twice the advantage when using your gun. Killstreaks need to be less over powered. You can only gain a HIGH killstreak if you get a "payback" from the last enemy who killed you. A killstreak should be team used, not indualvidualy.

The following user thanked oX-matto-Xo for this useful post:

Murt
05-30-2011, 09:16 PM #4
They should add a feature that if they don't kill an enemy within a time, they would loose their streak. That would decrease the amount campers

The following 9 users say thank you to defwegwreh for this useful post:

Friday15, Greeves, iNK Shot, LeBron-James, lilnatsfan44, LordOlliee, Mr.Deagle, Njamimars, TheCodKittenz
05-30-2011, 09:20 PM #5
--Ben-
I SPEAK MY MIND!
Originally posted by Xo View Post
There killstreaks need to be more managed. Because a killstreak affects the whole game! Black Ops is a complete fail because noobs can get a GUNSHIP within 2 rounds of SnD and earn enough CP to unlock it. Then the camping begins!
I agree with your qoute "killstreaks are in the game to add that bit of excitement and an edge to the game" but dont you think there should be an alternative? Instead of focusing on killstreaks?

A Killstreak should be unlock by a Challenge, which makes it more harder to complete.

E.G.

Back Stab 5 enemies within 55 seconds - Unlocks UAV (No Teams Allowed)
Kill 3 Enemys by shooting a Claymore behind a wall - Unlocks Carpackages (No Teams Allowed)
Get 4 Heads in a row with an MP5 in 10 seconds - Unlocks Death Streak (No Teams Allowed)

(No Teams Allowed - Avoids Cheaters)

This gives the advanatge of people using there Gun alot more, it gives people the "feel" of each gun, and makes them more insterested into battle, instead of camping in the corner. It also shows how good you are by how well you complete challenges in battle.

Qoutes:

A killstreak should give you twice the advantage when using your gun. Killstreaks need to be less over powered. You can only gain a HIGH killstreak if you get a "payback" from the last enemy who killed you. A killstreak should be team used, not indualvidualy.


I think the example killstreaks you said are very hard, and this would make people criticism the difficulty of actually being able to obtain a killstreak. However, I do agree with the comment of killstreaks double the damage factor to your gun, I think this would be a good factor to be implied. And feel free to post your opinion here, You must login or register to view this content. Awesome face

Conclusion, more killsteaks = more fun, but make the killstreaks a little harder to obtain, and make the killstreaks less powerful, I think this would make the game achieve the maximum level off achievement for everyone.

The following user thanked --Ben- for this useful post:

atifI0
05-30-2011, 09:25 PM #6
They should have less "kill"streaks. Id like to see killstreaks other than choppers and AC130's to actually kill people with.

They almost had it with MW2 they should add more things like EMP. EMP would have been a viable killstreak if it were lets say a 7 kill instead of 15.

They should mix things up abit maybe a killstreak that removes the enemy teams perks for 60s , just something that doesn't actually Kill.

I agree everything should be harder to unlock this whole Cod Points gimmick was a pile of shit. You earned enough for an item in a few games.

Or maybe atleast limit the amount of aicraft in the air to 1 , there were times on MW2 where i would just spawn and die.
05-30-2011, 09:30 PM #7
oX-matto-Xo
#1 Chaos MW3
Originally posted by ChazzWorld View Post
They should add a feature that if they don't kill an enemy within a time, they would loose their streak. That would decrease the amount campers


I agree, that would be a smart feature. So for example, every kill you get add 5 seconds to your count down, the longer you wait the time willl run out, resulting in a -1 killstreak lose. So you have to keep gaining kills with you gun to reach the killstreak!

---------- Post added at 10:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:28 PM ----------

Originally posted by Green View Post
They should have less "kill"streaks. Id like to see killstreaks other than choppers and AC130's to actually kill people with.

They almost had it with MW2 they should add more things like EMP. EMP would have been a viable killstreak if it were lets say a 7 kill instead of 15.

They should mix things up abit maybe a killstreak that removes the enemy teams perks for 60s , just something that doesn't actually Kill.

I agree everything should be harder to unlock this whole Cod Points gimmick was a pile of shit. You earned enough for an item in a few games.

Or maybe atleast limit the amount of aicraft in the air to 1 , there were times on MW2 where i would just spawn and die.


This is also a good idea, a streak that aids your gun ability, so your not actually in the sky killing everyone, you get an extra boost, like Health boost or 15% damage increase. So you still need to use your gun! This will encourage people to play more, and be less scard.
05-30-2011, 09:32 PM #8
Murt
< ^ > < ^ >
Originally posted by Xo View Post
I agree, that would be a smart feature. So for example, every kill you get add 5 seconds to your count down, the longer you wait the time willl run out, resulting in a -1 killstreak lose. So you have to keep gaining kills with you gun to reach the killstreak!

---------- Post added at 10:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:28 PM ----------



This is also a good idea, a streak that aids your gun ability, so your not actually in the sky killing everyone, you get an extra boost, like Health boost or 15% damage increase. So you still need to use your gun! This will encourage people to play more, and be less scard.

nice i like ur think =] . OFF TOPIC: can i play with u on psn? LOL . sorry
for any inconvience =D
05-30-2011, 10:31 PM #9
Porter_Justice
Cake is a lie
I think more people favor killstreaks than don't. Black Ops in particular isn't a game full of killstreaks. Regardless of your exaggerations "Noobs" don't get Gunships unless in a care package. Also 90% of my deaths aren't from campers either so I doubt 90% of COD players are campers. Most people who don't like killstreaks either get raped by them OR they can't earn high killstreaks to begin with. Less killstreaks won't stop camping because OUR job is to stop campers. But in the COD community EVERYBODY who kills us was hiding behind like 5 claymores with Ghost, a FAMAS and magical bullets. Thats who ALL our deaths happen from campers right?

Black Ops killstreaks aren't as easy to obtain as on MW2. Getting 8-11 kills in a row should yield you air support kills. I doubt Activision or even EA Dice try to stop camping. Camping is half truly annoying and half a scapegoat the majority of the COD community uses. Do I hate getting killed by a guy laying prone by a door? **** YES but I don't convince myself that death didn't count.

You're entitled to your opinion and it is well articulated but I don't "we" meaning majority of COD community would like less killstreaks. Especially if you think it would stop camping. W@W had 3 killstreaks but that didn't stop camping did it???

Camping will be in FPS like Madden players picking mostly Super Bowl teams, MLB gamers picking Yankees, Red Sox or Phillies. Or NBA gamers picking Lakers or Heat or whatever the easiest team is.

I'm not saying you are bad at the game because clearly I don't know but usually the people who hate AC-130s, Dogs, Gunships or Choppers are the people who can't get one. In their minds only "campers" can...

It'd be like a 300 lb guy saying he hates pretty girls. We know why we would ... Because he has no chance of getting one lol.

The following 7 users say thank you to Porter_Justice for this useful post:

AMNE, Battle Papaya, ClutchLikeBron, Markie-, real954378, riotmost, x420XP
05-30-2011, 11:28 PM #10
/facepalm just get over camping. or quit playing in domination

The following user thanked MW3Glitchers for this useful post:

txlonghorn97

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo