Originally posted by Justice
COD4 and W@W had less campers because there were WAY LESS COD PLAYERS.
Unless you're talking about MW2 I doubt you get killed in Black Ops by ks 60% of the time.
Like I've said the only people who want less killstreaks are those who can't get them. If someone is getting Dogs, Choppers,Pavelows and AC130 why would they want that taken away??? Only scrubs getting UAV would want killstreaks weakened.
Honestly the camping complaints are worse than camping itself. What do we expect people to do? Run around saying "here I am shoot me!"? And when people do rush scrubs will say that guy is a "tryhard" or his gun is "overpowered".
Dude those are my opinions, When I play COD4 or when I played COD4 when it was still new, there were less campers then there are now gen. MW2/BO simply because there was a much valid reason to camp.
Besides camping, I just gennerally hate Killstreaks, yes I do get them anyway, inb4 you cannot get killstreaks because ubad.
Just the sake of that you get killed by an NPC vehicle makes the MP part less fun, it's a first person shooter, killstreaks are fun but do not make them the one who gets the most is the best, because that's not true.
In MW2 if you got your harrier 60% chance that you could get your nuke
if you got predator like 80% chance you get your harrier.
I mean seriously, do you think that is fun/amazing/skilled?
Stop saying that campers are better then everyone because they don't most of em have a low reaction anyway, they change spots and all that and they use claymores/scavenger and heartbeat, he must be so skilled to use all of that.
Prove me wrong, but that is just what I think of it.