(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Are you 'pro-life' or 'pro-choice'? Whichever you are, why?

Basically what your saying is the baby doesnt fit her lifestyle. These clinics are all business they dont care for the baby or the mothers life just how much money they can make. Any woman who puts a baby in her arms especially her baby has a special connection with the baby. A teen girl will feel like an outcast if she has a baby so she chooses to kill the baby. Why doesnt she have the baby then go the adoption route some families would love to have kids but cant. I know people who have adopted babies and their lives arent miserable, yet there are kids who never get adopted and they turn out fine. I hate the assumption that killing life is a positive thing just because society says it is okay doesnt mean we have to choose what society says. We live our life by this societies standards I can assure you that you will be miserable.

No, technically they are forcefully living off of the mother.



People already exercise caution like this - condoms can only do so much. You could have sex once, be 100% 'safe' and a little swimmer could still slip through. It happens. Because of that, abortion is a good solution to some and an abhorrent one to others - let's debate abortion without talking about abstinence when as I've already explained it's not reasonable. Actually, come to think of it, it's just circular reasoning.



Although that's very hyperbolic, sure, let's say I'm saying that. Women still need the right to an abortion in this instance for moral reasons I've already explained.



You only have that problem if you 'moderate' abortion. This is also a superbly extreme example, just like the one above.



Within this context, we both now that when you say "be mindful and aware" you're really trying to say "abstain". Don't sugarcoat it.



'Pre-cum' among other things can still make women pregnant. Those little swimmers are very keen.



Just save some time and join me on the surprisingly not so dark side.


Using that as an example, sure. So what? It's still her body to do with as she pleases.



So are most churches. At least these clinics do something for the money they receive.



Yes, it's hormonal. It's instinctive. It's natural. It's also irrelevant.



Because the system is already clogged with kids that want to be adopted. I'm so sick of this adoption line, I must have addressed this a dozen times by now.



I agree with the last bit but for completely unrelated reasons.

Even if we could guarantee (we can't) that every single kid born would live a life worth living, that doesn't negate the fact that the foetus is forcefully living off of the mother and therefore the mother should have the right to an abortion at any time if she so desires. Let's not forget also that pregnancy can pose a very real health risk. Once again, it's her body over the foetus'.

If abortion is passively encouraged like how your currently representing, then we will see a much higher increase in unborn babies.

Do you want that?

I'm indifferent towards it. I certainly don't fear it like you do...

Also, the word is 'foetus''. Get it right.



Adoption isn't viable as the number of kids to be adopted outweighs the number of parents looking to adopt. Significantly.

Lots of people who use birth control still get pregnant, it's not 100% effective.



Why would the prior intentions affect the morality of the abortion, other than to punish the pregnant woman?

Restricting abortions solely to punish someone is despicable.

Okay everyone, clutch here believes that abortion should be allowed in every circumstance no matter the cause, and should be spammed fruitlessly as everyone and their mother can be indifferent to the severity of not having a child. Thus the whole point of this discussion is fruitless, since the topic creator only sees in one way, perhaps clutch is a playboy of some sort who disregards the existence of life inside of the female body, or perhaps he had a bad experience, whatever the tale we will never know, all we know is that abortion should be available in all forms, and should be done as much as possible since everyone is too ignorant to take alternatives to preventing them from happening.

/Thread

So if this baby shouldnt have a life then what about idk lets say the special needs kids because they in your belief will not have a life worth living should we just kill them too? The baby in the womb has rights too just because a baby doesnt fit the girls lifestyle doesnt mean she should kill the baby. You have to look at both sides and actually visit a clinic to see the psychological things that happen to these girls.

---------- Post added at 12:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:10 PM ----------



Its funny that someone who already has life says kill the baby would you feel the same if your mom attempted to abort you imagine how you would feel?

If they were forcefully living off of someone in the way that a foetus does and said person didn't want them anymore, sure. But that'd basically be abortion, huh?



Women find it difficult because they've a natural inclination to procreate. That's all.



If she had aborted me when I was in the womb then I wouldn't be around anymore, would I? You can't care once you're non-existent.

This is all beating around the bush though - my argument strongly revolves around the whole forcefully living off of the mother thing. Without trying to appeal to emotion, can you actually refute that?