Originally posted by maddmaxx93
So Microsoft is breaking the law everytime it locks up a computer running pirated Windows?
All they ever do is lock the OS(software), not the system(hardware). This means you can install another OS via your boot menu, whereas if Sony bricked your console you're down and out several hundred dollars. IOW, illegal.
Originally posted by another user
This CFW shit is all about piracy, and/or disrupting other people's online experience with bullshit cheats. I would guess that 95% of users installing CFW, do so for only those reasons, and no other.
I believe the percentage would be much lower than that, and yes cheaters and whatnot do come about because of CFW. The real issue here is the game developers' security, just look at Black Ops there's barely any hacks on there(MP) and that's with full access to the system. And in regards to piracy so what? Anything you pirate on PS3 can already be pirated on any PC in the entire world, it's just an unfortunate side-effect of having a system opened up.
Originally posted by another user
Sony does have the right to lock up your system to protect it's intellectual property, as well as that of it's developers. That is simply a legal fact, like it or not.
No they don't, that would be a blatant abuse of consumer's rights. All they can legally do is block your access to PSN, if they tried to brick CFW consoles they would be sued for billions(quite literally).
Originally posted by another user
Now let's get on to this other OS everybody has their collective panties in a knot over. I've owned a PS3 since shortly after it's release in the North America. I've never seen that function specifically advertised, let alone highly advertised as you people keep droning on about.
That's because all advertising of it stopped immediately once it was removed from the system, so of course you're not going to see it advertised anymore. And I doubt you'd remember if you saw it advertised a few years ago, unless of course you specifically bought the system for that purpose.
Originally posted by another user
It was removed to prevent intrusion into their system.
*COUGH* Our system. We paid for it the hardware is ours, otherwise we're essentially merely renting it from Sony.
Originally posted by another user
Now the backwards compatability they removed from my ancient fat PS3, that pissed me off a quite a bit. Again though, it's their right to modify their firmware as they see fit, it belongs to them, you only own a license to use it. I hate to break this to you, should the HD functionality (though in no way similar to this topic, as the PS3 is an entertainment system other OS was not a main selling point, only a bonus)become a threat to the companies security, Samsung could remove it. I'm not saying the way the law protects huge corporations to the point of making them untouchable is right, I'm just letting you know what actually is legal and what isn't.
Right but you're missing the point yet again, all they could legally do is remove the software that makes the HD or the backwards compatibility work. If they remotely broke the hardware yet again that's enormously against the law, and they'd get sued to near-bankruptcy. And this is where custom firmware comes in, it allows you to do whatever you like with
your own legally purchased and owned hardware.
I understand if you hate cheaters on CoD and I understand if you stand strongly against piracy however claiming Sony have the legal right to remotely brick your system to an unrecoverable extent is an outright lie, and you know it(and if you don't, ask any lawyer).
---------- Post added at 02:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:20 PM ----------
Originally posted by swingo1020
Consumer's rights my a$$, this is just getting plain pathetic. Just a bunch of nerdy kids/adults in their mom's basements with nothing to do but f--- things up for everyone. Consumer's rights...just a smoke screen to get people to support them or to justify why they would be doing it.
Without consumer's rights you don't essentially own anything you pay money for... how does that sound to you?